Return-Path: Received: from host6.canaca.com ([66.49.160.142] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4746810 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:00:37 +0200 Received: from 207-195-100-23.regn.static.sasknet.sk.ca ([207.195.100.23] helo=[192.168.1.38]) by host6.canaca.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SfBZv-00033Q-1K for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:03:19 -0400 From: Jack Tunnicliffe Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EB14D178-8213-407F-A987-4073794DA0B0" Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] musings on the future of Mac "Pro" Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:03:16 -0600 In-Reply-To: To: "After Effects Mail List" References: Message-Id: <969E6994-79C0-49F6-88E4-25F94A40CA6F@javapost.ca> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host6.canaca.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - media-motion.tv X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - javapost.ca X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: --Apple-Mail=_EB14D178-8213-407F-A987-4073794DA0B0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii True, but I just did a dance piece all shot 120fps on an Epic and a Sony = F3 with an HD finish and I thought the F3 looked better. The large F3 = pixels gather more light at those higher speeds and so the image has = less noise. The maximum image on the Epic was about 60 divisions and had = to be boosted to 100 divisions adding additional noise. Now the Epic = wasn't terribly noisy but I could certainly see the difference on a good = monitor.=20 Jack Tunnicliffe Java Post Production www.javapost.ca On Jun 14, 2012, at 7:17 AM, James WIlson wrote: > Not to mention that you can do 120 fps. >=20 > On Jun 13, 2012, at 8:00 PM, Jack Tunnicliffe wrote: >=20 >> Working on a movie right now shot Epic 5K. Many shots are = repositioned and zoomed up as much as 200%. You can't do this with = something that's 1920x1080 in the first place. You can zoom in a little = but now 200% to make a single out of a wide shot.=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail=_EB14D178-8213-407F-A987-4073794DA0B0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii True, = but I just did a dance piece all shot 120fps on an Epic and a Sony F3 = with an HD finish and I thought the F3 looked better. The large F3 = pixels gather more light at those higher speeds and so the image has = less noise. The maximum image on the Epic was about 60 divisions and had = to be boosted to 100 divisions adding additional noise. Now the Epic = wasn't terribly noisy but I could certainly see the difference on a good = monitor.

Jack Tunnicliffe

Java Post Production

On Jun 14, 2012, at 7:17 AM, James WIlson wrote:

Not to mention that you can do = 120 fps.

On Jun 13, 2012, at 8:00 PM, Jack Tunnicliffe = wrote:

Working on a = movie right now shot Epic 5K. Many shots are repositioned and zoomed up = as much as 200%. You can't do this with something that's 1920x1080 in = the first place. You can zoom in a little but now 200% to make a single = out of a wide = shot.

= --Apple-Mail=_EB14D178-8213-407F-A987-4073794DA0B0--