Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4746825 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:01:20 +0200 Received: by obbta14 with SMTP id ta14so1950830obb.28 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:04:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=AnCfPCWe3vuumuV1RgrKjRIUtngOC8VP3BcGV1/TagU=; b=xYu3QcRjjeoPK5JsoHAXorL5VbXBYWH3QmQr+1Q4uxfVjWWavaYxFcoWFiLMyrRmZm PsrOEKKQBY4WSVPQ/fFMgdjv7tY9sM7C6zQ1OtIJqWNozrMUo8J64KzpS+49OokhdPtz MteYyILeCDLz6If3IHks4vACrbO8ch48/xqw7A04M0in6mvTYVrrJMnYQbpPHx2Tdn7K MNXMjekSw2eOkSNktoWy2Iq5yXM1ecX+cgg1q8+6gF4/wJ0B6Qm19+Vh26nrPwDgnuav 8LRJ0ue22SRYJK+Qj8tW0Wuh4NvNZE5tOn4JincsvrOWm1uV9GMfODmxerWPaq5/kE37 I/4w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.152.73 with SMTP id uw9mr2259876obb.0.1339686243139; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:04:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.199.41 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:04:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.199.41 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 08:04:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:04:03 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] [OT] The Mac Pro is dead From: Teddy Gage To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04451881a1ffd104c270028b --f46d04451881a1ffd104c270028b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Lol. They do not have Mac pro render farms. Even pixar can't afford that. Well they could but they'd be wasting money. They run Linux server clusters with Intel hardware for rendering. Not to say they don't probably do a lot of design work on osx http://blogs.computerworld.com/pixars_rendering_software_big_on_linux_servers_not_mac On Jun 14, 2012 9:29 AM, "James WIlson" wrote: > I've been semi following this thread and I can't help but wonder...isn't > Pixar using Mac Pros to crank out all those frames? Why would Jobs ignore > such money maker as the ongoing development of the power workflow for > cinema? I mean there's just as much money in ticket sales, royalties, and > merchandizing as any other product line so I wouldn't see why the MacPro > development would fall by the wayside for volume iPhone and iPad sales > alone unless they're just not using any of them. > > Perhaps someone here knows more about the inner workings of the Pixar. > > > > On Jun 14, 2012, at 9:14 AM, Scott Carmichael wrote: > > Anyone else wonder if Steve could have cared less about the high-end > machines any more because they weren't high profile enough so they had > been shelved as far as development resources? Maybe Tim is smart enough to > realize that the "pros" actually are an important part of the market and > put them back in the development pipeline. That is why they are so far out > from being shipped. > > Scott > > On Jun 14, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Karl Newman wrote: > > On Jun 14, 2012, at 7:21 AM, Benny Christensen wrote: > > Well, first you have to have a TB hub so that you can attach your > ethernet, storage adapters and monitor. > > > Most TB devices can daisy-chain depending on the chip they used. Obviously > an ethernet adaptor would need to be the end of the chain, or on the new > Retina MBP it could be on a second port. > > One thing I haven't seen mentioned much is that you can daisy-chain two > Apple Thunderbolt displays and have three monitors, including the MBP, > running at once. > > > Karl Newman > Karl Newman Productions > > kwnewman@verizon.net > > > > > > > --f46d04451881a1ffd104c270028b Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Lol. They do not have Mac pro render farms. Even pixar can't afford = that. Well they could but they'd be wasting money. They run Linux serve= r clusters with Intel hardware for rendering. Not to say they don't pro= bably do a lot of design work on osx

http://blogs.computerworld.com/pixars_rendering_s= oftware_big_on_linux_servers_not_mac

On Jun 14, 2012 9:29 AM, "James WIlson"= ; <lists@jwmm.com> wrote:
I've been semi following this threa= d and I can't help but wonder...isn't Pixar using Mac Pros to crank= out all those frames? Why would Jobs ignore such money maker as the ongoin= g development of the power workflow for cinema? I mean there's just as = much money in ticket sales, royalties, and merchandizing as any other produ= ct line so I wouldn't see why the MacPro development would fall by the = wayside for volume iPhone and iPad sales alone unless they're just not = using any of them.

Perhaps someone here knows more about the inner workings of = the Pixar.



On Jun 14,= 2012, at 9:14 AM, Scott Carmichael wrote:

Anyone else wonder if Steve could have = cared less about the high-end machines any more =A0because they weren't= high profile enough so they had been shelved as far as development resourc= es? =A0Maybe Tim is smart enough to realize that the "pros" actua= lly are an important part of the market and put them back in the developmen= t pipeline. =A0That is why they are so far out from being shipped.

Scott

On Jun 14, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Kar= l Newman wrote:

On Jun 14, 2012, at 7:21 AM, Benny Christensen wrote:=

Well, first you have to have a TB hub so that you can attach your ether= net, storage adapters and monitor.

Most TB devices can daisy-chain depending on th= e chip they used. Obviously an ethernet adaptor would need to be the end of= the chain, or on the new Retina MBP it could be on a second port.

One thing I haven't seen mentioned much is that you= can daisy-chain two Apple Thunderbolt displays and have three monitors, in= cluding the MBP, running at once.


<= div style=3D"word-wrap:break-word">
Karl Newman
Karl Newman Productions

kwnewman@verizon= .net






<= /div> --f46d04451881a1ffd104c270028b--