Return-Path: Received: from gateway01.websitewelcome.com ([67.18.65.19] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4746999 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 18:50:54 +0200 Received: by gateway01.websitewelcome.com (Postfix, from userid 5007) id 936A686E713F0; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:53:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from alpina.websitewelcome.com (alpina.websitewelcome.com [74.54.176.2]) by gateway01.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E0486E713CA for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:53:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [199.21.106.94] (port=51349 helo=[192.168.0.7]) by alpina.websitewelcome.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SfDIg-0004MK-Eh for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:53:38 -0500 From: Chris Meyer Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2950C664-3174-4F47-B830-C24D5430DBB2" Subject: Re: [AE] comp viewers with different viewing resolution Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:53:37 -0600 In-Reply-To: To: "After Effects Mail List" References: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - alpina.websitewelcome.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - media-motion.tv X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - crishdesign.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: ([192.168.0.7]) [199.21.106.94]:51349 X-Source-Auth: chris@crishdesign.com X-Email-Count: 2 X-Source-Cap: Y3Jpc2h3ZWI7Y3Jpc2h3ZWI7YWxwaW5hLndlYnNpdGV3ZWxjb21lLmNvbQ== --Apple-Mail=_2950C664-3174-4F47-B830-C24D5430DBB2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 To be clear, he's talking Resolution (where fewer pixels are calculated, = speeding up interactivity for large comps), not Magnification (which is = how many pixels are viewed). On Jun 14, 2012, at 10:45 AM, Daniel Ramirez wrote: > Out of curiosity, what benefit do you get out of two viewers with one = at 100% and the other at less than 100%? >=20 >=20 > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Evan Fotis = wrote: > Hello all, > is it possible to have two comp viewers of the same comp, one to = display at 100% quality, and the other at 50% or quarter? > At the moment any change I make affects both comp viewers. > Thanks >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to >=20 --Apple-Mail=_2950C664-3174-4F47-B830-C24D5430DBB2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 To be clear, he's talking Resolution (where fewer pixels are calculated, speeding up interactivity for large comps), not Magnification (which is how many pixels are viewed).

On Jun 14, 2012, at 10:45 AM, Daniel Ramirez wrote:

Out of curiosity, what benefit do you get out of two viewers with one at 100% and the other at less than 100%?


On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Evan Fotis <evan.fotis@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello all,
is it possible to have two comp viewers of the same comp, one to display at 100% quality, and the other at 50% or quarter?
At the moment any change I make affects both comp viewers.
Thanks

+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>


--Apple-Mail=_2950C664-3174-4F47-B830-C24D5430DBB2--