Return-Path: Received: from mail-bk0-f41.google.com ([209.85.214.41] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4747048 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:32:14 +0200 Received: by bkcjm19 with SMTP id jm19so1695819bkc.28 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:34:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-tagtoolbar-keys :content-type; bh=q0Wu50RLS8fHd8OuqZsZDICDJF+KRGraYn5pGcE6SwE=; b=SdQes/nFIUH4Z3Yu/qZsFfcNsBS2sttuv30BbtLymtcaTZlQOr0l7LErOc5QO3ZQjq t9Qcjar77DsMziDRVm4AqFLxw83mNhJJzJ/dAES0PzDrFPwro36Jwq4SpBCLqKZ6ooD5 grDPQTR/KK2VCDQN723QyyRK5rs4FIy9zXyfrjKhSO869M1dp8imUMgB94rAOjyTt2pe PuSv8Klis94LPJhKsVzKblBDqEe9UxCxf1gybDXvXpYUTGRAeqfmkM3Tj96eS34lcfIk uL7qPS/WwGjcqmFGRtWaFiRxneo0CATsclAz256wO+g36StizYVWCyfjyarsaegMfxR9 iSqg== Received: by 10.204.128.88 with SMTP id j24mr1621989bks.89.1339695298951; Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:34:58 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.2] (cust-233-240.on4.ontelecoms.gr. [92.118.233.240]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x23sm7488053bkw.12.2012.06.14.10.34.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FDA20EA.8000502@gmail.com> Disposition-Notification-To: Evan Fotis Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:35:38 +0300 From: Evan Fotis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080914 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.17 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] comp viewers with different viewing resolution References: In-Reply-To: X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20120614203538790 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070502050608080404050901" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070502050608080404050901 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Ideally it' d be nice if both comp viewers could display at full quality without having a hit in performance. The reason I compromise with low rez in working comp viewer is whenever I drag out a second comp viewer having both in full rez, there is a substantial delay in refreshing the image. As for its usefulness, I use it both ways, one comp viewer (work one) zooming in and out, the other, fixed full-screen to see the overall look. I use the same in PS etc, by expanding the navigator window to a secondary monitor full screen as I'm detailing on main monitor. FWIW PS displays a sharper image in the navigator than in main window when its not at 100% zoom factor. On 14-Jun-12 20:09, Daniel Ramirez wrote: > Exactly. By linking the resolution of each comp view, AE only has to > render the frame once per frame. De-coupling this could make a frame > render happen N times per frame. I'm assuming that's why it behaves > this way right now. > > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Chris Meyer > wrote: > > To be clear, he's talking Resolution (where fewer pixels are > calculated, speeding up interactivity for large comps), not > Magnification (which is how many pixels are viewed). > > On Jun 14, 2012, at 10:45 AM, Daniel Ramirez wrote: > >> Out of�curiosity, what benefit do you get out of two viewers with >> one at 100% and the other at less than 100%? >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Evan Fotis > > wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> is it possible to have two comp viewers of the same comp, one >> to display at 100% quality, and the other at 50% or quarter? >> At the moment any change I make affects both comp viewers. >> Thanks >> >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to >> > > >> >> > > --------------070502050608080404050901 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Ideally it' d be nice if both comp viewers could display at full quality without having a hit in performance.
The reason I compromise with low rez in working comp viewer is whenever I drag out a second comp viewer having both in full rez, there is a substantial delay in refreshing the image.

As for its usefulness, I use it both ways, one comp viewer (work one) zooming in and out, the other, fixed full-screen to see the overall look.
I use the same in PS etc, by expanding the navigator window to a secondary monitor full screen as I'm detailing on main monitor.
FWIW PS displays a sharper image in the navigator than in main window when its not at 100% zoom factor.

On 14-Jun-12 20:09, Daniel Ramirez wrote:
Exactly. By linking the resolution of each comp view, AE only has to render the frame once per frame. De-coupling this could make a frame render happen N times per frame. I'm assuming that's why it behaves this way right now.

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Chris Meyer <chris@crishdesign.com> wrote:
To be clear, he's talking Resolution (where fewer pixels are calculated, speeding up interactivity for large comps), not Magnification (which is how many pixels are viewed).

On Jun 14, 2012, at 10:45 AM, Daniel Ramirez wrote:

Out of�curiosity, what benefit do you get out of two viewers with one at 100% and the other at less than 100%?


On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Evan Fotis <evan.fotis@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello all,
is it possible to have two comp viewers of the same comp, one to display at 100% quality, and the other at 50% or quarter?
At the moment any change I make affects both comp viewers.
Thanks

+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>



--------------070502050608080404050901--