Return-Path: Received: from qmta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.27.228] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4754100 for ae-list@media-motion.tv; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 22:51:51 +0200 Received: from omta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.71]) by qmta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id R8fF1j0051Y3wxoAF8uo4Y; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 20:54:48 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.5] ([76.121.99.34]) by omta15.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id R8un1j0080kX2M08b8uo1J; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 20:54:48 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Subject: Re: [AE] contracts, slightly OT From: Andrius Simutis In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:54:47 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <95126E2F-7751-4717-A3C7-D486075A4509@Comcast.net> References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) I'd like to bounce this idea off the collective wisdom of the list=85 = It's not too uncommon for us to offer a discount somewhere in the = invoice. Often it's just deducting the padding that we put in to the = estimate and didn't wind up needing. What I'm thinking of doing for a = couple clients who notoriously pay late is putting a line that says = something to the effect of "All discounts are null and void if invoice = is not paid in full within 30 days."=20 My question is if this would be an acceptable practice, or even legal. = My thought on it is that if I give a discount that wasn't in the = original agreement, I can take away that discount.=20=