Return-Path: Received: from out-71.smtp.ucla.edu ([169.232.46.168] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4755182 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 10:44:39 +0200 Received: from smtp-14.smtp.ucla.edu (smtp-14.smtp.ucla.edu [169.232.46.250]) by out-71.smtp.ucla.edu with ESMTP id q5N8lITd016081; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 01:47:18 -0700 Received: from mail.ucla.edu (m6.mail.ucla.edu [128.97.27.134]) by smtp-14.smtp.ucla.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q5N8lITd016081 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 01:47:18 -0700 Received: from [192.168.0.107] (adsl-69-231-51-209.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net [69.231.51.209]) (user=wheaton mech=PLAIN bits=0) by mail.ucla.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id q5N8lBtA018355 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2012 01:47:16 -0700 Subject: Re: [AE] frame rate weirdness References: From: Warren Heaton at UCLA Extension Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-CCCF6BD6-E515-43F1-A042-FD50F2C3533D In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <6DAC41B3-8A96-435B-B376-82473B0EA6BA@ucla.edu> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 01:45:55 -0700 To: After Effects Mail List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206) X-Probable-Spam: no X-Spam-Hits: 1.819 X-Spam-Score: ** X-Spam-Report: HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,SPF_PASS X-Scanned-By: smtp.ucla.edu on 169.232.46.250 --Apple-Mail-CCCF6BD6-E515-43F1-A042-FD50F2C3533D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Whenever this is the lecture topic, students tend to glaze over or go on Fac= ebook. Sent from my iPad On Jun 22, 2012, at 3:46 PM, Jack Tunnicliffe wrote: > Interesting, but I can tell you we see this every day. A we are a post fac= ility, we get footage from editors from all over the place. Very few of them= seem to understand anything about frame rates, pulldown, interlacing, etc. I= t's like editors never go to school for this, or does the school know enough= to teach them the ins and outs? We just end up fixing the problem and sendi= ng them a bill so there is an upside to knowing how to fix these issues.=20 >=20 > Jack Tunnicliffe > Java Post Production > www.javapost.ca >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Jun 22, 2012, at 4:33 PM, Chris Meyer wrote: >=20 >> We used to find we had to re-conform Avid footage in particular all the t= ime. Just force 29.97 in the AE Interpret Footage (and mocha project) dialog= s. >>=20 >> still pining for universal 30,000/1001 support - >> Chris >>=20 >>=20 >> On Jun 22, 2012, at 12:06 PM, pixelbot@comcast.net wrote: >>=20 >>> we sent out some QTs to be color corrected and when we got them back I w= as tracking them for screen replacement - my mocha tracks looked spot on, an= d then when I used those track in AE - every track looked liked it was playi= ng catch up, I tried multiple times to track and try cc power pin vs corner p= in nothing would fix it, and then I looked at the frame rate in AE it showed= that they were 29.9625 not 29.97 - once I reinterpreted to 29.97 every trac= k was spot on. I going to have to check with the post house that did the CC -= I wouldn't even begin to know how they screwed that up. >>>=20 >>> timt >>=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail-CCCF6BD6-E515-43F1-A042-FD50F2C3533D Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Whenever this is the lectu= re topic, students tend to glaze over or go on Facebook.





Sent from my iPad

= On Jun 22, 2012, at 3:46 PM, Jack Tunnicliffe <jack@javapost.ca> wrote:

Interesting, but I can tell you we see this every day. A= we are a post facility, we get footage from editors from all over the place= . Very few of them seem to understand anything about frame rates, pulldown, i= nterlacing, etc. It's like editors never go to school for this, or does the s= chool know enough to teach them the ins and outs? We just end up fixing the p= roblem and sending them a bill so there is an upside to knowing how to fix t= hese issues. 

Jack Tunnicliffe
Java Post Production
www.javapost.ca



On Jun 22, 2012, at 4:33 PM, Chris Meyer wrote:

We used to find we had to re-conform Avi= d footage in particular all the time. Just force 29.97 in the AE Interpret Fo= otage (and mocha project) dialogs.

still pining for unive= rsal 30,000/1001 support -
Chris


On Jun 22, 2012, at 12:06 PM, = pixelbot@comcast.net wrote:

we sent out some QTs to be color correcte= d and when we got them back I was tracking them for screen replacement - my m= ocha tracks looked spot on, and then when I used those track in AE - every t= rack looked liked it was playing catch up, I tried multiple times to track a= nd try cc power pin vs corner pin nothing would fix it, and then I looked at= the frame rate in AE it showed that they were 29.9625 not 29.97 - once I re= interpreted to 29.97 every track was spot on. I going to have to check with t= he post house that did the CC - I wouldn't even begin to know how they screw= ed that up.

timt


= --Apple-Mail-CCCF6BD6-E515-43F1-A042-FD50F2C3533D--