Return-Path: Received: from mail-gg0-f169.google.com ([209.85.161.169] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4757734 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 21:15:46 +0200 Received: by ggm4 with SMTP id 4so285415ggm.28 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:18:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=FVRW71T/ozMN4sPgD9IgM60DD8zEDuQ+YvX29m8zifw=; b=SvaZMGR1izpyNkAsMK15KkvB59WV5z5lDftMZ8HRTMOOk6DkQVo4115brCpiI5pnak MFywzQ6UcmaMQk+YREQNdjG1+Qv+EERucTJ2aWDbd7iroWHzUnkVfkQ2S+oUxbW7kRS1 xg9xbSB1DK1r+xzaEsq+0vYexhLRR4zBskKRNxthlUA2QfIQGRcApXDuAoPjw6fltJy5 pMQOtCpysBsh6f2s/ePtO3EQeF9l8y5ncQyXU9OMjw5devqDA14EP8JfU1Wo1+JK9F1W lR0T3FKIkl2293qRuSvsOjy3jRhk00zaHCB2HoU1vw9Mys9G8ORZaB4sZz1/u5/KgIyU Ki5w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.104.167 with SMTP id gf7mr12440458igb.38.1340738332102; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:18:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.17.200 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.17.200 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:18:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:18:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] frame rate weirdness part deux From: Darby Edelen To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f2357cd058e5204c364f8c5 --e89a8f2357cd058e5204c364f8c5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 8:14 to 10:17 is a 5:4 ratio, which is the same ratio as 29.97:23.976. Probably not a coincidence. I've tried playing in DaVinci but I'm by no means an expert. Its supposed to be fairly smart at render, but i wouldn't be surprised if the timeline was set up for the wrong frame rate at the outset... perhaps DaVinci defaults to frame rate conversion at render. On Jun 26, 2012 12:00 PM, wrote: > ok a bit more weirdness on the files that 29.9625 FPS - I'm looking at > the files we send and the files we received back, for example one of the > files we sent was 8:14 @ 29.97 and it came back as 10:17 @ 29.9625. They > only had the footage we gave them and they were color correcting on a > software DaVinci. My only thought is they ingested the footage as some > funky frame rate and then exported it at something close to 29.97. Does > this even sound plausible to anyone who uses a DaVinci? any other ideas - > just trying to track this down so that it doesn't happen again, don't want > to go into this fight with a little more knowledge. > > Timt > --e89a8f2357cd058e5204c364f8c5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

8:14 to 10:17 is a 5:4 ratio, which is the same ratio as 29.97:23.976. P= robably not a coincidence.

I've tried playing in DaVinci but I'm by no means an expert. Its= supposed to be fairly smart at render, but i wouldn't be surprised if = the timeline was set up for the wrong frame rate at the outset... perhaps D= aVinci defaults to frame rate conversion at render.

On Jun 26, 2012 12:00 PM, <pixelbot@comcast.net> wrote:
ok a bit more weirdnes= s on the files that =A029.9625 FPS - I'm looking at the files we send a= nd the files we received back, for example one of the files we sent was 8:1= 4 @ 29.97 and it came back as 10:17 @ 29.9625. They only had the footage we= gave them and they were color correcting on a software DaVinci. My only th= ought is they ingested the footage as some funky frame rate and then export= ed it at something close to 29.97. Does this even sound plausible to anyone= who uses a DaVinci? any other ideas - just trying to track this down so th= at it doesn't happen again, don't want to go into this fight with a= little more knowledge.

Timt
--e89a8f2357cd058e5204c364f8c5--