Return-Path: Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.194] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4762447 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:47:18 +0200 Received: from [10.1.1.22] (71-13-195-18.static.eucl.wi.charter.com [71.13.195.18]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LuOpr-1RnLwb1RMl-0111ym; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 13:50:35 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Subject: Re: [AE] OT NAS From: Steve Oakley In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 12:50:40 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <284BCB25-2898-4697-9E98-2513C79DFB4B@practicali.com> References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:ArF2o80fmlupFwjmQXkvGJ4LGVJqUxCM2FFBAq8/TUH OIXWfmnKB2RjFiFZuDCyLpVmzC9uv5+Ys4DAXHRQp/oS+kTaY0 LKAgwjmSJcLTKCl1zIXJ/Q/rnVNiQKebOem9IWvwRMo609dhFG zha4xgtZNYs2dzonxjZ7vQE97JZnjX2wHEjDI8IBN2q2SD2YEW zM0r0rce5N/uensq77sG1chPP1l5d1gEldmZdMOJg8UmWUDZL4 DmjT8paylVi0B38gxm9qohdstGAQjmRGF9KP/4aV39LyFszI69 sQ2Ejxdpp3zOqTjOQpOC4BWS0C2ZtT97oG7Srqq4QCsWACU4uD Y7pgKpr48/Kyehcp8xPM3aHpkd1coo2Z2tWHIaKvSY9CS575RM ZSPKHVYB9aGHQ== those stand alone NAS boxes are Krap in general. they are generally = based on FreeNAS / BSD and always seem to have poor network performance = ( 30mb/sec over gigabit in my testing ). I've got a linux / fedora = based NAS here that runs great. if you don't have linux skilz just do a = mac OS based box because its faster, simpler, easier and will have good = performance. S >=20 > On Jul 2, 2012, at 11:08 AM, James WIlson wrote: >=20 >> Hi, Does anyone use NAS drives with good results? >> I was looking at a couple yesterday and wasn't sure if it's worth it = just for backup and general asset storage, or maybe I should grab = another G-RAID (some flavor of). >>=20 >> Thanks, >>=20 >> Jim W. >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to