Return-Path: Received: from mta11.charter.net ([216.33.127.80] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4791644 for ae-list@media-motion.tv; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 22:02:21 +0200 Received: from imp10 ([10.20.200.15]) by mta11.charter.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.02 201-2260-151-103-20110920) with ESMTP id <20120730200632.JLRA10966.mta11.charter.net@imp10> for ; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:06:32 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.14] ([71.94.133.66]) by imp10 with smtp.charter.net id gk5Z1j00H1S6qBK05k6XR9; Mon, 30 Jul 2012 16:06:32 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=u2vu/Ocp0bQ6m2MO0KUY0MS1xIoK39gCmxTU3UkKy94= c=1 sm=1 a=yUnIBFQkZM0A:10 a=Vx6aIzdhH7H4BIXK4xUDUQ==:17 a=hOpmn2quAAAA:8 a=9OkusMzH4d6kn4b03SIA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=RFaxJ1YKWH0A:10 a=p3b_eOXHgIUA:10 a=hUswqBWy9Q8A:10 a=r_zKX0J30e7cpn4CstkA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=Vx6aIzdhH7H4BIXK4xUDUQ==:117 From: Jonathan Penzner Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-26-299370994 Subject: Re: [AE] DVD Question Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:06:30 -0700 In-Reply-To: To: "After Effects Mail List" References: Message-Id: <22EF277D-AA0F-4451-AC90-DFEE78CC5327@charter.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) --Apple-Mail-26-299370994 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Thanks for the tip, Andrius. I can probably get the client to fork over = the money for it if it becomes an issue. Jonathan On Jul 30, 2012, at 12:55 PM, Andrius Simutis wrote: > For 250 minutes on a DVD9 your bit rate would be 4.1mbps for the video = assuming you're using .ac3 for the audio.=20 > That's pretty low for compressor even running VBR with a wide range, = so you might want to run some test clips to make sure that what you're = getting looks decent enough for the client. =20 > If you want to get the most out of Compressor (and you're doing this = often enough to justify spending $800) I'd recommend the Cinemacraft = CCE-MP plug in. It does a really nice job at the lower bit rates where = Compressor often falls down.=20 > -Andrius Simutis >=20 > On Jul 30, 2012, at 8:42 AM, Michael Hazarian wrote: >=20 >> Yea, 250 minutes should be doable with mpeg2, particularly if there = is a good amount of synthetic footage. I was just providing a bit of an = aside. >>=20 >> Mike Hazarian >>=20 >>>>> On 7/30/2012 3:38 AM, Jonathan Penzner wrote: >>>>>> Good day to everyone. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> A client wants to jam around 250 minutes of video into a standard = DVD. Is that even possible or will the result just look like such crap = that it becomes pointless? It's a combination of of footage, graphics = and audio =96 VO over a bed, in most cases. Just wondering what the = accepted wisdom is here. Perhaps a dual layered DVD is the answer. But = will that play in standard players? >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Thanks in advance. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Jonathan >>>>>>=20 >=20 >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to JONATHAN PENZNER SUNDANCE/REALTIME VIDEO EDITING =95 MOTION GRAPHICS =95 DESIGN | STUDIO 626 345-0285 | | CELL 818 321-2890 | SUREAL@CHARTER.NET --Apple-Mail-26-299370994 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
For 250 minutes on a DVD9 your bit rate would be = 4.1mbps for the video assuming you're using .ac3 for the audio. =
That's pretty low for compressor even running VBR with a wide range, = so you might want to run some test clips to make sure that what you're = getting looks decent enough for the client.  
If you want to get = the most out of Compressor (and you're doing this often enough to = justify spending $800) I'd recommend the Cinemacraft CCE-MP plug in. It = does a really nice job at the lower bit rates where Compressor often = falls down.
-Andrius Simutis

On Jul 30, 2012, at 8:42 AM, = Michael Hazarian wrote:

Yea, 250 = minutes should be doable with mpeg2, particularly if there is a good = amount of synthetic footage. I was just providing a bit of an = aside.

Mike = Hazarian

On = 7/30/2012 3:38 AM, Jonathan Penzner = wrote:
Good = day to = everyone.

A = client wants to jam around 250 minutes of video into a standard DVD. Is = that even possible or will the result just look like such crap that it = becomes pointless? It's a combination of of footage, graphics and audio = =96 VO over a bed, in most cases. Just wondering what the accepted = wisdom is here. Perhaps a dual layered DVD is the answer. But will that = play in standard = players?

Thanks = in = advance.


Jonathan



+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any = message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
= --Apple-Mail-26-299370994--