Return-Path: Received: from [67.18.137.86] (HELO gateway14.websitewelcome.com) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4793636 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 01:59:06 +0200 Received: by gateway14.websitewelcome.com (Postfix, from userid 5007) id D9130CB1FCD56; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 19:03:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from gator1184.hostgator.com (gator1184.hostgator.com [174.121.151.98]) by gateway14.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A44CB1FCD21 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 19:03:21 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [24.167.166.243] (port=59453 helo=Neptune) by gator1184.hostgator.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Swisq-00075r-PI; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 19:03:20 -0500 Reply-To: From: "Stephen van Vuuren" To: "'Steve Oakley'" , "'After Effects Mail List'" References: <043BC9FB-7B3A-44C2-A9CA-D97C93F42A5E@practicali.com> In-Reply-To: <043BC9FB-7B3A-44C2-A9CA-D97C93F42A5E@practicali.com> Subject: RE: [AE] OT - Urgent Premiere rendering question Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 20:03:18 -0400 Organization: SV2 Studios Message-ID: <01ab01cd7042$391bad40$ab5307c0$@sv2studios.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01AC_01CD7020.B20B93E0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQHvtOg1yjXH3/mIyf7YN2xP9u4TDAJAlBIvlu8VkrA= Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator1184.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - media-motion.tv X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - sv2studios.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: (Neptune) [24.167.166.243]:59453 X-Source-Auth: stephen@sv2studios.com X-Email-Count: 3 X-Source-Cap: c3RlcGhlbnY7c3RlcGhlbnY7Z2F0b3IxMTg0Lmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20= This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_01AC_01CD7020.B20B93E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > just change the footage interpretation to 23.976 in PP by right clicking it in a bin. Thanks - I'm aware of that. But the situation is he's rendered a feature film and shipped it to me. I'm trying to figure out if he needs to render at 23.976 if Premiere has blending frames to get to 24.000 or if it's smarter than that. stephen van vuuren 336.202.4777 http://www.insaturnsrings.com/ http://www.sv2dcp.com/ http://www.sv2studios.com/ A film is - or should be - more like music than like fiction. It should be a progression of moods and feelings. The theme, what's behind the emotion, the meaning, all that comes later. -Stanley Kubrick From: Steve Oakley [mailto:steveo@practicali.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 7:55 PM To: After Effects Mail List; stephen@sv2studios.com Subject: Re: [AE] OT - Urgent Premiere rendering question just change the footage interpretation to 23.976 in PP by right clicking it in a bin. S On Aug 1, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Stephen van Vuuren wrote: I've got a client who has output a 23.976 sequence in Premiere CS5 as 24.000 in TIFF sequence. Any idea if CS5 interpolates to create those frames? And if so, does it do it well or poorly? There does appear to be softness but don't see typical motion artifacts when stepping through. But I don't have the source project here - it's across the country. stephen van vuuren 336.202.4777 http://www.insaturnsrings.com/ http://www.sv2dcp.com/ http://www.sv2studios.com/ A film is - or should be - more like music than like fiction. It should be a progression of moods and feelings. The theme, what's behind the emotion, the meaning, all that comes later. -Stanley Kubrick ------=_NextPart_000_01AC_01CD7020.B20B93E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> just change the footage interpretation to 23.976 in PP by = right clicking it in a bin.

 

Thanks – I’m aware of that. But the situation is = he’s rendered a feature film and shipped it to me. I’m = trying to figure out if he needs to render at 23.976 if Premiere has = blending frames to get to 24.000 or if it’s smarter than = that.

 

stephen van vuuren

336.202.4777

 

http://www.insaturnsrings.com/=

http://www.sv2dcp.com/<= /b>

http://www.sv2studios.com/<= /span>

 

A film is – or should be – more like music than like = fiction. It should be a progression of moods and feelings. The theme, = what’s behind the emotion, the meaning, all that comes = later.

–Stanley Kubrick

 

From:= = Steve Oakley [mailto:steveo@practicali.com]
Sent: Wednesday, = August 01, 2012 7:55 PM
To: After Effects Mail List; = stephen@sv2studios.com
Subject: Re: [AE] OT - Urgent Premiere = rendering question

 

just change = the footage interpretation to 23.976 in PP by right clicking it in a = bin.

 

S

 

 

On = Aug 1, 2012, at 5:33 PM, Stephen van Vuuren <stephen@sv2studios.com> = wrote:



I’ve = got a client who has output a 23.976 sequence in Premiere CS5 as 24.000 = in TIFF sequence. Any idea if CS5 interpolates to create those frames? = And if so, does it do it well or poorly? There does appear to be = softness but don’t see typical motion artifacts when stepping = through. But I don’t have the source project here – = it’s across the country.

 =

stephen = van vuuren=

336.202.477= 7

 =

http://www.sv2studios.com/<= span = style=3D'font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"'>=

 =

A film is = – or should be – more like music than like fiction. It = should be a progression of moods and feelings. The theme, what’s = behind the emotion, the meaning, all that comes later.=

–S= tanley Kubrick=

 =

 

------=_NextPart_000_01AC_01CD7020.B20B93E0--