Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com ([209.85.217.169] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4805611 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 08:45:56 +0200 Received: by lbon3 with SMTP id n3so92746lbo.28 for ; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 23:46:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Khu5Mo+Ic1upKZ7KQBad9rXjGA9ZC+0PRdf8s0Hl0Lc=; b=teWkSXox5D9bQLXULep9ylAnrQwOZ73pKPd0Rq46GuGqZ+m8w9kbblm7nnTSAkbd8k ci88Iv3Ge1qOXmKuWmhpKjjE7EdX/twSZ2fpb1AHYaS74vOIzh1DVYci3pAFWdhAUSA2 AFPOxVpHs5B75/2xym8Kiwx9veiak7CFs+f/uoZhM2VbaGKLeAo3Nio4fe0PNUD74Rwi MzShH9gBBWYPnJ26JuHkNzwjHCWEQ0i5Bgi3XQNnIK2NQLJLaOykttD/QBCrDLIMqR5o 0fXADiUBIUgt5l7iOpnfy9REP6I9QahaY0gnnKpSD5Titsmcp66P/tcLMumakl+wW4US nn+A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.46.9 with SMTP id r9mr279841lbm.81.1344494767077; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 23:46:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.89.43 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 23:46:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:46:07 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Scaling camera shake From: jarret langmeire To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0401236ffe7b7d04c6cf9440 --f46d0401236ffe7b7d04c6cf9440 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Dan, That sounds like it's exactly right. At the moment I've got no setup as I didn't want to get too deep and then have to amend things. In the past I've simply been parenting the shake keyframes to a null and linking that to the camera (exactly like the link that Jack sent through earlier). So as far as setups go, I'm wide open to suggestions. Cheers Jarret On 9 August 2012 16:34, Dan Ebberts wrote: > It seems like you need a reference point (like a null) that represents > the camera=92s position without the shake. Then you could subtract the sh= ake > position from the reference, scale the result, and add it back. It=92s ha= rd > to say exactly without seeing how you have things set up though. > > Dan > --f46d0401236ffe7b7d04c6cf9440 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Dan,

That sounds like it's exactly right. At the = moment I've got no setup as I didn't want to get too deep and then = have to amend things. In the past I've simply been parenting the shake = keyframes to a null and linking that to the camera (exactly like the link t= hat Jack sent through earlier). So as far as setups go, I'm wide open t= o suggestions.

Cheers

Jarret

On 9 August 2012 16:34, Dan Ebberts <debberts@= comcast.net> wrote:
It seems like you need a reference point (like a null) that represents= the=20 camera=92s position without the shake. Then you could subtract the shake po= sition=20 from the reference, scale the result, and add it back. It=92s hard to say e= xactly=20 without seeing how you have things set up though.
=A0
Dan

--f46d0401236ffe7b7d04c6cf9440--