Return-Path: Received: from mk-filter-3-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.100.54] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4806326 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 00:32:56 +0200 X-Trace: 791542500/mk-filter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com/B2C/$THROTTLED_DYNAMIC/b2c-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP/85.210.42.34/None/bah_humbug@tiscali.co.uk X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 85.210.42.34 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: bah_humbug@tiscali.co.uk X-SMTP-AUTH: X-Originating-Country: GB/UNITED KINGDOM X-MUA: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308 X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag8LAIzgI1BV0ioi/2dsb2JhbABFqiCOSgJ1gQiCIQEFCDAeLgUFAwNGOR4GGwmIALtvjQUYg3ZgA4gZknmKRoJg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,742,1336345200"; d="scan'208";a="791542500" Received: from 85-210-42-34.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO i7) ([85.210.42.34]) by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with SMTP; 09 Aug 2012 23:33:07 +0100 Message-ID: <59F1E5A11C884D34864066BC4F3A1CF0@i7> From: "Dave J" To: "After Effects Mail List" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Scaling camera shake Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 23:33:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308 I hope Jarret (and the list) will forgive me if this is a really dumb suggestion (I'm a little out of practice), but wouldn't a simple size change on the reference camera shake footage, pre tracking, give you controllable scaling of the amplitude of shake? The "weight" of the camera might be compromised, and any rotational twist will not be scaled of course..... Just a thought..... dave jervis