Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com ([209.85.217.169] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4806364 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 01:40:52 +0200 Received: by lbon3 with SMTP id n3so526561lbo.28 for ; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:41:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=IXYkJPZuBsVLhGrwkPpc24sYAASqd6i7MimKBZyMm0U=; b=cLcKL0Zvv4KIiqrtNcHSxkdCVrcQu7SqAoQbPucF4zSwUEcp4C9LYI7SjX/YQoinFG fe/b1KVx04Svmlmu8be8OuHZg4Sf/m9x9n/fXa64PYPA+TuIR1IuOIZd5RNRkAjZV5+7 dZKbeEmBmCaucyZ4tb7A25e5pZLhHFXvLkwV7cu6WOwF9fQSDhHV++yWBSdX4wAD+kdn 89BPNZLiLEtBymIWZPLFIcDImaxkp3/o1cLHgrVyot/2fxLSHgMWiZzEvD7E78cxepR+ eEDLlG7mSxle4Bc1yrzdbYh/pj2QtK8aidA/sIEpWmWgk6wY0Nn6OV3o/aSyM9ggxPmi ePwQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.108.144 with SMTP id hk16mr1030466lab.2.1344555664000; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 16:41:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.89.43 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:41:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 09:41:03 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Scaling camera shake From: jarret langmeire To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54d4dd6bbc49404c6ddc2f1 --bcaec54d4dd6bbc49404c6ddc2f1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Dave, Interesting, I hadn't considered that (no offence taken). Just tried it out and unfortunately not the results I need. I think Dan's suggestion is the one thats going to deliver results. I'll post it here if I figure it out. Cheers Jarret On 10 August 2012 08:33, Dave J wrote: > I hope Jarret (and the list) will forgive me if this is a really dumb > suggestion (I'm a little out of practice), but wouldn't a simple size > change on the reference camera shake footage, pre tracking, give you > controllable scaling of the amplitude of shake? > > The "weight" of the camera might be compromised, and any rotational twist > will not be scaled of course..... > > Just a thought..... > > dave jervis > > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to > -- -- Jarret --bcaec54d4dd6bbc49404c6ddc2f1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Dave,

Interesting, I hadn't considered that (no o= ffence taken). Just tried it out and unfortunately not the results I need. = I think Dan's suggestion is the one thats going to deliver results. I&#= 39;ll post it here if I figure it out.

Cheers

Jarret

On 10 August 2012 08:33, Dave J <bah_humbug@tisca= li.co.uk> wrote:
I hope Jarret (and the list) will forgive me= if this is a really dumb suggestion (I'm a little out of practice), bu= t wouldn't a simple size change on the reference camera shake footage, = pre tracking, give you controllable scaling of the amplitude of shake?

The "weight" of the camera might be compromised, and any rotation= al twist will not be scaled of course.....

Just a thought.....

dave jervis


+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>



--
--

<= /div>
Jarret

--bcaec54d4dd6bbc49404c6ddc2f1--