Return-Path: Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4829517 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 00:00:44 +0200 Received: by lahd3 with SMTP id d3so1042546lah.28 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:01:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=JGC0buLpuf46VIwig7ozWLzsuGDBrgkP0lhbS6u7kpk=; b=PVFebqrT2Z5QVA/TnTPGg/keU8UqO+Ygw/sYmJILiZ4zeiVdVdvXlsYNL/HehQpeYe B3j7MAFaS4CVWHKMBEReX35cCsEd7LrddI5Xx0Eg12PiTtVn/Yl+jGtPxSvn5qgYtBjE CEmkgr+dDuvWMXhGeDjCYoCVVKwsWIKI77al37/RbxXZeOT2iktSlRnsfflq6NdRTjw9 yr9YiGE4lKKRQkVflCNYMECsDlRDA+HUgPYHrsMifk519xUjEswmHoHnQB3pFRkMV2gm lycaPlAQ3/Cytg5pxWrkRkN51w5V9jn0tH87AEUHBxNNBLQHMYi2axCPmUi3ARTUojx/ O81Q== Received: by 10.112.36.130 with SMTP id q2mr643634lbj.44.1346277694218; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:01:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.148.194 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:00:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Teddy Gage Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:00:53 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Video card question To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e0cb4efe32a2bba3ce04c86eb347 --e0cb4efe32a2bba3ce04c86eb347 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Brian what are you basing that opinion on? I agree but for a different reason. The gtx 580 or 590 has almost double the CUDA power (not cores) as the 680 or 690, and more than triple the 670. It is a very significant upgrade to CUDA and the 3D raytracing engine I have experienced first hand. nVidia gimped the CUDA performance on the kepler gpus. This has been shown on multiple benchmarks. Also the gtx 580 is cheaper than a new 680. I'd highly recommend the 3GB 580 or the 6GB 590. a lot of bang for the buck On Aug 29, 2012 4:37 PM, "Brian Higgins" wrote: > I would not. > > -b > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Jeanette Barekman wrote: > >> I am in the process of buying a new workstation and I am wondering if I >> should add the $750 cost to upgrade from a Nvidia GTX 670 to the GTX 690. >> I am a prosumer who works primarily with After Effects, Premiere Pro and >> Photoshop. >> Also am wondering since Windows 8 is due to be launched soon if I should >> wait so that I will have a turnkey system. >> Thank you very much. I enjoy this list immensely and appreciate the >> knowledge that I obtain from it. >> >> Jeanette Barekman >> > > > > -- > brian higgins | senior vfx artist > Sol Design > 312.706.5500 > higgins@soldesignfx.com > soldesignfx.com > > > > --e0cb4efe32a2bba3ce04c86eb347 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Brian what are you basing that opinion on? I agree but for a different r= eason. The gtx 580 or 590 has almost double the CUDA power (not cores) as t= he 680 or 690, and more than triple the 670. It is a very significant upgra= de to CUDA and the 3D raytracing engine I have experienced first hand. nVid= ia gimped the CUDA performance on the kepler gpus. This has been shown on m= ultiple benchmarks. Also the gtx 580 is cheaper than a new 680. I'd hig= hly recommend the 3GB 580 or the 6GB 590. a lot of bang for the buck

On Aug 29, 2012 4:37 PM, "Brian Higgins&quo= t; <higgins= @soldesignfx.com> wrote:
I would not.

-b

On Wed, Aug 29, 20= 12 at 3:34 PM, Jeanette Barekman <jsbarekman@yahoo.com> w= rote:
I am in the process of buying a new= workstation and I am wondering if I should add the $750 cost to upgrade fr= om a Nvidia GTX 670 to the GTX 690.
I am a prosumer who works pri= marily with After Effects, Premiere Pro and Photoshop.=A0
Also am wondering since Windo= ws 8 is due to be launched soon if I should wait so that I will have a turn= key system.
Thank you very much.=A0 I enjoy this list immensely and appreciate the knowledge= that I obtain from it.
=A0
Jeanette Barekm= an



--
brian higgins | senior vfx artist
Sol = =A0Design
312.706.5500=A0<= br>



--e0cb4efe32a2bba3ce04c86eb347--