Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.219.41] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4842607 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:29:23 +0200 Received: by oagj6 with SMTP id j6so404005oag.28 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:30:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=GSJEbRkbQAiFMoDcA+VGI+9CfIjWgpVQhlWFDsg1QUo=; b=KZk+DSmbokf8FLI573wjif0uzVOF5XF8IzhwAXxjSLvFktLjnuToo2ZUdomwli9MuF wn7WMJNr8RYLRIoJqIhUkT0/RVUKfr8z19J1k1qBwqHsxjkdtm+PwnE9sdxRYd42XiDl 2h+yC28sUiZa+XgdQuP4G7YTNACLRj7R4ySX/Tc0OB0qI8AlPnOiMBk50H2umcPX2yn3 ZNwFB5msp3Y6haE6V40mbtytUowpYg8nHHF1577K7aZ02CiwgUcZCcTbn9ra/yDIwa9W y8+3h4XZjdgqJt97/OQx5XaaYFezm9RyKuXhxCSOts20uzP39brqmYXUMDLkS81wlWav BqNw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.170.47 with SMTP id aj15mr19192677oec.29.1347384636677; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:30:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.29.163 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 10:30:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:30:36 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] CS6 new 3D From: rendernyc To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54c5228a51e8004c9706e91 --bcaec54c5228a51e8004c9706e91 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 If i have the budget for a k5000 id probably spend it on a Cubix box and a some GTX580s. On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Jack Tunnicliffe wrote: > No, just looking at the side benefit for AE. I want the performance for > Resolve. I thought some others might be interested to know about this card > as currently there are very few cards approved for Mac out of the NVIDIA > line. I sometimes need full resolution 4K frames out of Resolve and the GPU > exhausts. For most things, HD and 2K a GTX 285 can handle real time but not > 4K. > > Jack Tunnicliffe > Java Post Production > www.javapost.ca > > > > On Sep 11, 2012, at 11:20 AM, rendernyc wrote: > > Im pretty sure the K5000 will be overkill if you are just looking for > speeding up after effects renders. For $2500 you can get a lot more > performance or save some cash > > > http://www.loopoutcontinue.com/2012/08/benchmarking-cuda-performance-in-after-effects-cs6/ > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:16 PM, rendernyc wrote: > >> you should see decent soft shadows and blur around 6 or so. >> DoF renders a bit differently in raytrace comps than they do in classic >> 3d and of course DoF is an expensive operation in 3D. >> >> also it sounds like you dont have an NVidia card with CUDA. with a decent >> card what you are trying should render relatively fast. >> >> without one it would be painful and i wouldnt recommend trying :) >> >> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Rick wrote: >> >>> I must be doing something wrong. I have a line of text that is extruded >>> and raised up off a solid used as the floor. I have two lights on it and I >>> have the objects reflecting off each other. If I turn depth of field on the >>> camera, I have to crank the ray tracing quality up to 15 to get a smooth >>> blur and shadows if the DOF is shallow. I tried this last night before I >>> left work and after 14 hours of rendering to a jpeg sequence, it had only >>> done 55 frames. While I don't mind reliving AE from the mid nineties, I >>> must be doing something wrong. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Rick Emery >>> www.rickemery.com >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> danny princz >> >> exposedideas.com >> > > > > -- > danny princz > > exposedideas.com > > > -- danny princz exposedideas.com --bcaec54c5228a51e8004c9706e91 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If i have the budget for a k5000 id probably spend it on a Cubix box and a = some GTX580s.


On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 a= t 1:24 PM, Jack Tunnicliffe <jack@javapost.ca> wrote:
No, just looking at the side benefit for AE. I want the performance for Res= olve. I thought some others might be interested to know about this card as = currently there are very few cards approved for Mac out of the NVIDIA line.= I sometimes need full resolution 4K frames out of Resolve and the GPU exha= usts. For most things, HD and 2K a GTX 285 can handle real time but not 4K.=

Jack Tunnicliffe
Java Post Production
www.javapost.ca


On Sep 11, 2012, at 11:20 AM, rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:<= /div>
Im pretty sure the K5000 will be overkil= l if you are just looking for speeding up after effects renders. For $2500 = you can get a lot more performance or save some cash

http://www.loo= poutcontinue.com/2012/08/benchmarking-cuda-performance-in-after-effects-cs6= /

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:16 PM, rendernyc <= span dir=3D"ltr"><rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote:
you should see decent soft shadows and blur around 6 or so.
DoF re= nders a bit differently in raytrace comps than they do in classic 3d and of= course DoF is an expensive operation in 3D.

also it sounds like you dont have an NVidia card with CUDA. with a dec= ent card what you are trying should render relatively fast.

without one it would be painful and i wouldn= t recommend trying :)

On Tue, = Sep 11, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Rick <a_pmb_fan@yahoo.com> wrote:=
I must be doing something wrong. I have= a line of text that is extruded and raised up off a solid used as the floo= r. I have two lights on it and I have the objects reflecting off each other= . If I turn depth of field on the camera, I have to crank the=A0ray tracing= =A0quality up to 15 to get a smooth blur and shadows if the DOF is shallow.= I tried this last night before I left work and after 14 hours of rendering= to a jpeg sequence, it had only done 55 frames. =A0While I don't mind = reliving AE from the mid nineties, I must be doing something wrong.<= /div>

Thanks,
=A0



<= font color=3D"#888888">--
danny princz

exposedideas.com



--
danny princz=

exposedideas= .com




--
danny princz

exposedideas.com
--bcaec54c5228a51e8004c9706e91--