| Danny we saw this too even on a Quadra 6000.
Really depends on what you are trying to do. For some things it is pretty snappy for others not at all :-( We had one project at 5k res and we were trying to do a glass finish with CS6 Raytracer and we had to give up on it and use "other" solutions. The 3D transparency seems to take it’s toll (at least it did for us).
Not bashing the CS6 Raytracer... simply saying that the Raytracer is not fast enough for some situations and just amazing for others. Use with care.
HTH
Cheers, Chris mettle.comOn 2012-09-11, at 2:09 PM, rendernyc wrote: wait, u have CUDA cards and you know that they are working and its still dreadfully slow?are they showing up in the AE Prefs->Previews->GPU???
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Rick <a_pmb_fan@yahoo.com> wrote:
I've got a GTX 680 in one box and a GTX 670 in my box. I got the 680 on the recommendation of Todd K. When I built this new box, I had a set budget and got the 670 in order to get a little more ram. When the other artist leaves tonight, I'll swap out the cards and see what difference it makes.
My system. HP z620
12 core 2.3ghz 32GBs ram
CS 6 Production Premium running on SSD EVGA GTX670 2GB ram the other card is EVGA GTX 680 3GB ram.
My personal experience is that even with a Quadro 4000 for Mac, raytrace rendering in Ae is unusably slow. YMMV. I bought the card for Pr, where it kicks some serious ass. . +---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to < ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
-- danny princz exposedideas.com
Cheers, Chris Mettle.com Skype: Mettlecom
|
