Return-Path: Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4842932 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 00:16:59 +0200 Received: by lahd3 with SMTP id d3so611887lah.28 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:18:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=oDKhw5QTX15L044I+XHX9/BQq09vF0dYmFOOA5bEafE=; b=q+C7J2KkKYKWlkS+sVF2Zam/jLu5QfItYmNRU/qvJZ9kQXTb8jJau4T8OBPfuAGwva 932BUWQStUGw2VPD9TKMkkFVRnYUv9ISw2J+6H5H0MIfS/mUEzjwtkU0XRGOWmipQbiT nH+MRd0V27bQJorpS3ZIOpXRJBa9kDSexACGRUGTe7d7RglGPSh5Jc/o49O0fQKpbeZu Exu3xNmikWiH3DgTEcw98JqT6O5dq5WYsaR5Nj1zAsawToZmjAOvJznepO2bx3kX+QLk 3Zoh0i5DLaBGRs8S6WCyoTwSFyeU4gZ4UWhj2U/+o2jwYiPF8jprcKGIrqXRkkhR4ryf hJFw== Received: by 10.112.26.38 with SMTP id i6mr6372009lbg.76.1347401894440; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:18:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.12.2 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:17:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Teddy Gage Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 18:17:32 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] CS6 new 3D To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec554dba449ade304c97473c9 --bcaec554dba449ade304c97473c9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable you're insane. that would have probably taken less than an hour on a new machine. and for under $1000 if you went pc. just saying... On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Chris Zwar wrote: > Oh now I have render envy. > I have an iMac that's over 4 years old, obviously no approved nVidia card > in it. I was playing around with CS6 to produce this tutorial: > > > http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/motiongraphicsvizfx/story/create_a= nd_animate_3d_cogs_in_after_effects_-_part_11/ > > The render times were about 55 minutes a frame, for a 640x360 comp with a > quality of about 8. It took a few days of rendering just to generate the= 5 > second 3D animation. > It's just too painful to consider using the ray tracer without an approve= d > card... > The only hassle now is to decide how to upgrade. That's a whole other > discussion... > > On 12/09/2012, at 5:02 AM, Rick wrote: > > Thank you very much. Render times for this comp with Ray Tracing set to 6 > in a 16 bit project 1920x1080 went from 96 seconds per frame to 3 seconds= . > > Rick Emery > www.rickemery.com > ------------------------------ > *From:* rendernyc > *To:* Rick > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 11, 2012 2:36 PM > *Subject:* Re: [AE] CS6 new 3D > > you just have to add the 670 to the raytracer_supported_cards.txt > > On OSX you have to =93show package contents=94 of the AE app and then > navigate to =93Support Files=94 folder > > Then add GeForce GTX 670 > > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Rick wrote: > > Crap. Just checked. On the 670 system, GPU is grayed out and says > 'incompatible device or display driver'. On the system with the 680 GPU = is > available. Looks like someone is losing their 680 tonight. It's good bein= g > the only one in graphics with admin rights for the boxes. (-; > > Thanks for the help. I was doing something wrong. Trying to save $150.00= . > > > Rick Emery > www.rickemery.com > ------------------------------ > *From:* rendernyc > *To:* After Effects Mail List ; Rick < > a_pmb_fan@yahoo.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 11, 2012 2:09 PM > > *Subject:* Re: [AE] CS6 new 3D > > wait, u have CUDA cards and you know that they are working and its still > dreadfully slow? > are they showing up in the AE Prefs->Previews->GPU??? > > > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Rick wrote: > > I've got a GTX 680 in one box and a GTX 670 in my box. I got the 680 on > the recommendation of Todd K. When I built this new box, I had a set > budget and got the 670 in order to get a little more ram. When the other > artist leaves tonight, I'll swap out the cards and see what difference it > makes. > > My system. > HP z620 > 12 core 2.3ghz > 32GBs ram > CS 6 Production Premium running on SSD > EVGA GTX670 2GB ram the other card is EVGA GTX 680 3GB ram. > > Rick Emery > www.rickemery.com > ------------------------------ > *From:* Jim Curtis > *To:* After Effects Mail List > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:35 PM > *Subject:* Re: [AE] CS6 new 3D > > My personal experience is that even with a Quadro 4000 for Mac, raytrace > rendering in Ae is unusably slow. YMMV. > > I bought the card for Pr, where it kicks some serious ass. > > > . > > > > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to > > > > > > -- > danny princz > > exposedideas.com > > > > > > -- > danny princz > > exposedideas.com > > > > --=20 Animator & Editor www.teddygage.com Brooklyn --bcaec554dba449ade304c97473c9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable you're insane. that would have probably taken less than an hour on a ne= w machine. and for under $1000 if you went pc. just saying...

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Chris Zwar <chris= @chriszwar.com> wrote:
Oh = now I have render envy.
I have an iMac that's over 4 years ol= d, obviously no approved nVidia card in it. =A0I was playing around with CS= 6 to produce this tutorial:


The render times were about 55 minutes a frame, for a 6= 40x360 comp with a quality of about 8. =A0It took a few days of rendering j= ust to generate the 5 second 3D animation.=A0
It's just too p= ainful to consider using the ray tracer without an approved card...
The only hassle now is to decide how to upgrade. =A0That's a whole= other discussion...

On 12/09/201= 2, at 5:02 AM, Rick wrote:

Thank you very much. Render times for this comp with Ray Tracing= set to 6 in a 16 bit project 1920x1080 went from 96 seconds per frame to 3= seconds.
=A0
From: rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com&= gt;
To: Rick <a_pmb_fan@yahoo.com&g= t;
Sent: Tuesday, September 11= , 2012 2:36 PM
Subject: = Re: [AE] CS6 new 3D

you just have to add the 670 to the =A0raytracer_supported_cards.txt
On OSX you have to =93show package contents=94 =A0of the = AE app and then navigate to =93Support Files=94 folder

=
Then add GeForce GTX 670

<= br>
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Rick <a_pmb_f= an@yahoo.com> wrote:
Crap. Just checked. On the 670 system, GPU is=A0gr= ayed=A0out and says 'incompatible device or display driver'. =A0On = the system with the 680 GPU is available. Looks like someone is losing thei= r 680 tonight. It's good being the only one in graphics with admin righ= ts for the boxes. (-;

Thanks for the help. =A0I was doing something wrong. Trying to = save $150.00.

=A0
From: rendernyc &l= t;rendernyc@gmail.com>
To: After Effects Mail List= <AE-List@media-motion.tv>; Rick <a_pmb_fan@yahoo.com&g= t;
Sent: Tuesday, September 11= , 2012 2:09 PM

Subj= ect: Re: [AE] CS6 new 3D

wait, u have CUDA cards and you know that they are working and its sti= ll dreadfully slow?
are they showing up in the AE Prefs->Previews-&g= t;GPU???



On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:52= PM, Rick <a_pmb_fan@yahoo.com> wrote:
I've got a GTX 680 in one box and a GTX 670 in my bo= x. I got the 680 on the recommendation of Todd K. =A0When I built this new = box, I had a set budget and got the 670 in order to get a little more ram. = When the other artist leaves tonight, I'll swap out the cards and see w= hat difference it makes.

My system.
HP z620
12 core 2.3ghz
<= span>32GBs ram
CS 6 Production Premium running on SSD
EVGA GTX670 2GB ram =A0the other card is EVGA = GTX 680 3GB ram.
=A0
From: Jim Curtis <jpcurtis@me.com>
<= b>To: After Effects Mail List &= lt;AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Sent: Tuesday, September 11= , 2012 1:35 PM
Subject: = Re: [AE] CS6 new 3D

My personal experience is that even with a Quadro 4000 for Mac, raytrace re= ndering in Ae is unusably slow.=A0 YMMV.

I bought the card for Pr, w= here it kicks some serious ass.


.




+---End of = message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>



=

--
danny princz

exposedideas.com




--
danny princz

exposedideas.com=






--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com
Brooklyn

--bcaec554dba449ade304c97473c9--