Return-Path: Received: from mail-iy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4846278 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 18:25:26 +0200 Received: by iagk10 with SMTP id k10so3147967iag.28 for ; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 09:26:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=BK0R2DVrADaRLOrvfgiEYkhWayTG3G6//4Qttwjrkso=; b=Si3gMzBfx7z9sL1aP5Wg2B4MWtrTLkgpTKFvkpqHCHALwxF1C5GyTHmyhd2XyUxG6S e6sSovypBY9b5q6K7haT5uOU7zWZlva27AvWAafbIecQxQFv8D6dJleGYTVLJvRlqTTZ 8OHy2zk7QvLKtjHVXHYWIPVKl4UmGerTloun+OtP4EDhSjrnmArquGz38+QZdbgxFIHM 76IYCUsCSm9j8aeMfBld8CUrKCh3D8FQ9kmJxPsDhhT0IzGmpJrqBPTQWLHln2hI+y6d 13NU0KSb4sba4JWRjOao21qzG1398brXH5iFjPsO8bs1UNc91MVPsukKpbXFka6OBk8L AM0Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.104.201 with SMTP id gg9mr3574370igb.67.1347640005699; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 09:26:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.165.167 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 09:26:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.165.167 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 09:26:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 09:26:45 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] alternative to track matte From: Darby Edelen To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f23435dd32a1204c9abe374 --e89a8f23435dd32a1204c9abe374 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sounds like you know what you need better than we do. Go for it. On Sep 14, 2012 6:07 PM, "Jim Curtis" wrote: > Yes, that should work, but that's more trouble than just duping the matte > and applying a track matte to each layer. I'm looking for a way to make > things easier, not harder. > > The simplest idea I can think of is Precomping all the layers I want to > mask, put the matte at the top, and use Stencil Alpha, etc. > > That way, any layers under the precomp are exempt from the "master" matte. > > Or, is there an even simpler way? > > > > On Sep 14, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Darby Edelen wrote: > > To clarify: the matte and footage layers each get their own precomp. > On Sep 14, 2012 5:52 PM, "Darby Edelen" wrote: > >> Set Matte may work if you precomp both the matte and footage layers >> (leave all attributes) and set the collapse transformations layer switch on >> the precomps. >> > > --e89a8f23435dd32a1204c9abe374 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sounds like you know what you need better than we do. Go for it.

On Sep 14, 2012 6:07 PM, "Jim Curtis" = <jpcurtis@me.com> wrote:
Yes, that should work, but that's m= ore trouble than just duping the matte and applying a track matte to each l= ayer. =A0I'm looking for a way to make things easier, not harder.
<= br>
The simplest idea I can think of is Precomping all the layers I = want to mask, put the matte at the top, and use Stencil Alpha, etc.

That way, any layers under the precomp are exempt from th= e "master" matte.

Or, is there an even simpler way?

<= div>

On Sep 14, 2012, at 10:54 AM, Darby Edelen= wrote:

To clarify: the matte and foo= tage layers each get their own precomp.

On Sep 14, 2012 5:52 PM, "Darby Edelen"= ; <dedelen@gmail.= com> wrote:

Set Matte may work if you precomp both the matte and footage layers (lea= ve all attributes) and set the collapse transformations layer switch on the= precomps.


--e89a8f23435dd32a1204c9abe374--