Return-Path: <jfeeley@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.160.41] verified)
  by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 4859203 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:43:12 +0200
Received: by pbbrq2 with SMTP id rq2so5114657pbb.28
        for <AE-List@media-motion.tv>; Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        bh=bKvh4z1fNVG9Qs0HkWCr4uTCJ8mF0T2LC4YpbpvxkDU=;
        b=Fuhv+5/GOUr4/oH8I08714eTa11w9xkbMVVkHNnGvU3J0KOk5qkt8Qr0q7x8tDcE8X
         TBLSqSsS+9euo+kNJId2SUDYfqWppaRg8RljPmiAAvZSgbo1oSR1THYDkWRI/tcZ5N71
         UHJtrWWZz0TEry2zyGZHdeofKP4H4eny5jsVXeje2yNrlpUdLtNQtzHp/P3rULatWW6Q
         kM3MCQIe8nrzLkkbF1jACSiqlsTw7A4kcIe/4dKPmy+KHUIcs6pTUBlpNUGt5EufR1Zc
         JHtXZ3gZlbAa0cD3pZjyLuRxmWmQgTjgD1igkxpVNg3aCM0Efmcfty/SHonZQlRjp05N
         vc4g==
Received: by 10.68.116.228 with SMTP id jz4mr21383344pbb.166.1348850697171;
        Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:44:57 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <jfeeley@gmail.com>
Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([50.0.206.252])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gj9sm5841362pbc.16.2012.09.28.09.44.55
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:44:56 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Subject: OT: Adobe: "Cinema DNG Initiative has been discontinued"
From: Jim Feeley <jfeeley@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-4859196@media-motion.tv>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 09:44:54 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ED2F8286-6BFE-4806-909D-EDB5DC5CEA4B@gmail.com>
References: <list-4859196@media-motion.tv>
To: "After Effects Mail List" <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)

Ya, a compressed mode was a big topic of discussion at the NAB meeting a =
couple years ago. In fact, in general I'd like to see Adobe offer or =
directly support a codec along the lines of DNxHD or ProRes.


Jim "just added 'OT' to the subject line" Feeley
jfeeley@gmail.com



On Sep 28, 2012, at 9:35 AM, Steve Oakley wrote:

> well considering a couple of camera now shoot to it, its finally =
gained some traction. the real problem of the format : lack of a =
compressed mode(s) long the lines of prores or dnxhd. nothing but =
uncompressed is very limiting for most folks because of the file sizes =
and large data rates.