Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4863184 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 17:51:06 +0200 Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id p5so285026lag.28 for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:53:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=CEqZyXUIKaVHb0NlfxmlRiq6Gp4P+r9MDv+Y0/OrnvQ=; b=kERgQteR6uN3kOcA/3/knsTLoyvD0MB1c2+oO9leRi9NdqgL5dd3V9qyDxW6KdhbUx U3qZVJrN0UG4Kh6LYf4nO4OcGEuA/gbCkehXrhLnQQILB5VVnSEGtyIT/wvlv5q/mNib F44obG5EH+0WE0cx4ocXlx3O1qgrTY6S2Ugwacu+sjjRq67IuiBWDo3DSrAPgna3cXSm oo39G72qaA/YOf0079xnoAo+Hpeizsa7Oy5oNA/KyE6PD/tA5vk99Rw+u4qmAs7npuAW 4POV7pOiUK1XV+hbJVh8R03kI/D9zJyX6C7jzvls2U5e7N35c4V6KEVLpE877ASrxIg2 2nsQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.39.138 with SMTP id p10mr1726287lbk.54.1349365984458; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 08:53:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.88.35 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 08:53:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 11:53:04 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] New to the list - question on rotoscoping From: Teddy Gage To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=485b390f7ac42cf6a304cb3dc0f9 --485b390f7ac42cf6a304cb3dc0f9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Not to beat a dead horse-thread, but I totally agree, those spots were just horrible. And weird. It felt like they were trying too hard to be 'hip' while the actual interviews were boring and forgettable, and had nothing to do with the style that was shoe horned onto them. Not why you want to remember something. On Thursday, October 4, 2012, Jim Curtis wrote: > FWIW, those Schwab spots were unsettling to me, and I can't imagine they > drove one dollar's worth of business. Seemed like a big waste of time and > money. Not sure why anybody would have thought that treatment would sell > more than real-life people. The technique distracted from the message. > And the only reason I found them memorable was because the concept was so > awful. > > IMO, > Jim C. > > > > > > > > . > > > > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to > > > -- Animator & Editor www.teddygage.com Brooklyn --485b390f7ac42cf6a304cb3dc0f9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Not to beat a dead horse-thread, but I totally agree, those spots were just= horrible. And weird. It felt like they were trying too hard to be 'hip= ' while the actual interviews were boring and forgettable, and had noth= ing to do with the style that was shoe horned onto them. Not why you want t= o remember something.=A0

On Thursday, October 4, 2012, Jim Curtis wrote:
FWIW, those Schwab spots were unsettling to me, and I can'= ;t imagine they drove one dollar's worth of business. =A0Seemed like a = big waste of time and money. =A0Not sure why anybody would have thought tha= t treatment would sell more than real-life people. =A0The technique distrac= ted from the message. =A0And the only reason I found them memorable was bec= ause the concept was so awful.

IMO,
Jim C.







.




+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-o= ff@media-motion.tv>


--
Animator &= Editor
www.teddygage.com=
Brooklyn

--485b390f7ac42cf6a304cb3dc0f9--