Return-Path: Received: from p3plwbeout04-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([72.167.218.225] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4863206 for ae-list@media-motion.tv; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 18:11:35 +0200 Received: from localhost ([72.167.218.243]) by p3plwbeout04-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with bizsmtp id 74DY1k0025FgiYg014DYjT; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 09:13:32 -0700 X-CMAE: v=2.0 cv=C7lrOHz+ c=1 sm=1 a=rBOEpJqQhQWCDE4kjGr1Uw==:17 a=LujJsNoJwlAA:10 a=QxD3r7Q-ggoA:10 a=8nbwq0jAnbYA:10 a=pnyGFoxxU9sA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=bDWiVW_OAAAA:8 a=TZb1taSUAAAA:8 a=UBX_jsatnJwA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=bWdBkzTTAAAA:8 a=YkWe4TQQFkLRRoSL4zgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=rBOEpJqQhQWCDE4kjGr1Uw==:117 X-SID: 74DY1k0025FgiYg01 Received: (qmail 4159 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2012 16:13:32 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Originating-IP: 75.83.206.115 User-Agent: Workspace Webmail 5.6.25 Message-Id: <20121004091331.89259f98f291d771214680e8971719cb.d89e234b77.wbe@email04.secureserver.net> From: "Robert W. Walker" To: "After Effects Mail List" Subject: RE: [AE] New to the list - question on rotoscoping Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 09:13:31 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Artists see things differently. Clients consider the work "horrible"=0Awhe= n it does not produce "results." The Schwab work ran long enough=0Athat we= can infer that it produced results. If nothing else, it appears=0Athat th= e look instantly evokes the word "Schwab" in a lot of people. =0AThat's kin= d of the job, by many definitions.=0A=0ARobert W. Walker=0ALos Angeles=0A= =0A> -------- Original Message --------=0A> Subject: Re: [AE] New to the li= st - question on rotoscoping=0A> From: Teddy Gage =0A>= Date: Thu, October 04, 2012 11:53 am=0A> To: "After Effects Mail List" =0A> =0A> =0A> Not to beat a dead horse-thread, but I= totally agree, those spots were just=0A> horrible. And weird. It felt like= they were trying too hard to be 'hip'=0A> while the actual interviews were= boring and forgettable, and had nothing to=0A> do with the style that was = shoe horned onto them. Not why you want to=0A> remember something.=0A> =0A>= On Thursday, October 4, 2012, Jim Curtis wrote:=0A> =0A> > FWIW, those Sch= wab spots were unsettling to me, and I can't imagine they=0A> > drove one d= ollar's worth of business. Seemed like a big waste of time and=0A> > money= . Not sure why anybody would have thought that treatment would sell=0A> > = more than real-life people. The technique distracted from the message.=0A>= > And the only reason I found them memorable was because the concept was = so=0A> > awful.=0A> >=0A> > IMO,=0A> > Jim C.=0A> >=0A> >=0A> >=0A> >=0A> >= =0A> >=0A> >=0A> > .=0A> >=0A> >=0A> >=0A> >=0A> > +---End of message---+= =0A> > To unsubscribe send any message to =0A> > >=0A> >=0A> =0A> =0A> -- =0A> Animator & Editor=0A> www.ted= dygage.com=0A> Brooklyn