| Hi Greg,
The only difference is bit rate. HQ gives better quality at bigger file sizes, though in some cases where I've compared frames, I've struggled to see the difference. They're both 10bit.
D. On Friday, 5 October 2012, Greg Balint wrote:
Can anyone, off hand, tell me what the diffs are between HQ and non-HQ?
///Greg Balint
//Art Director / Motion Graphics Designer
/321.514.4839
delRAZOR.com/
On 10/4/2012 7:54 PM, Gary Berendsen wrote:
I've been haing that as well, since cs6, well 5.5 as well.
prores non hq solved it for me.
Gary Berendsen - VFX
Generalist
Czaar Peter Straat 157-159
1018 PJ Amsterdam
+31614385398
skype: garyberendsen
I missed the
detail about it showing up in the final edit. If that's
true, this is something else.
Brian
Also this. I was gonna mention that.
But if they see the shift in fcp for final edit I
guess it does matter. They can't just gamma shift
it back?
On Oct 4, 2012 7:46 PM,
"Brian Maffitt" < brian@totaltraining.com>
wrote:
Before you completely panic, I think you may be
seeing a fairly well-know Quicktime-on-Windows
display bug. It only affects how the movie looks
when played in Quicktime, not when used in
another application. Take a look at the same
clip in VLC and see if it looks OK.
> Hey all,
>
> I'm running into some gamma issues or
something, which I've never seen before.
>
> I've previously had issue with the H.264
bug, where renders would come out lighter,
almost looking like their gamma was bumped up. I
know what that looks like and how to alleviate
it.
>
> This however, is a completely different
ball of yarn.
>
> Basically.. I can take a ProRes 422 HQ file
from my client (who wo
|
