Return-Path: Received: from atl4mhob10.myregisteredsite.com ([209.17.115.48] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4880564 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:33:37 +0200 Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by atl4mhob10.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9OAaC1K001994 for ; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 06:36:12 -0400 Received: (qmail 31563 invoked by uid 0); 24 Oct 2012 10:36:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (chris@chriszwar.com@122) by 0 with ESMTPA; 24 Oct 2012 10:36:12 -0000 From: Chris Zwar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: New iMac video cards and CS 6 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 21:36:09 +1100 Message-Id: <742835EB-E03A-4648-A978-052EE5D87E2F@chriszwar.com> To: After Effects email list Mail List Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) So I'm reading about the new iMacs that have just been released, on my = old iMac which is well over 4 years old... just wondering how the dinky = little video cards that Apple usually slips in them will fare with CS 6? = I know that some of you have been doing all sorts of benchmarks and = comparisons between the various discreet nVidea cards around, are you = able to guess how the new iMacs will compare? =46rom skimming the usual news sites, it looks like the base iMac comes = with a GT 640M, with the option for a GT 650M. The 27" models come with a GTX 660M, with the option for a GTX 675MX, or = the highest spec of a GTX 680MX with 2GB video ram. That's all Greek to me so just wondering if it makes more sense to = anyone else? I assume these are mobile parts and so I'm not expecting Quadro-like = performance in a consumer desktop machine, but the price to performance = comparison of a new iMac to a tricked out MacPro is usually very = attractive. -Chris=