| ||||||||||
| General performance should be pretty good on those for CUDA raytracing in AE its mostly about how many cores and their speed and then how much VRAM. The desktop cards have performed as good as the quadro in that regard
640 / 650/ & 660 have 384 cores 675 has 960 680 has 1536 They are probably are all underclocked compared to their desktop conuterparts
the retina macbook GT650M was a touch faster than a 12 core macpro with the Quadro 4800 (the slowest of the supported cards) both about an hour to render the scene Without a CUDA card the 12 core macpro take close to 7 hours to render the same scene
In comparison a GTX670 (also Kepler based) with 1344 cores, 3.5X more than the GT 650M, rendered the same scene about 3.5X faster (this was in a 2008 macpro) not exactly apples to apples but the higher end cards should perform pretty well, with the base cards at least making raytracing usable.
You can see our latest chart here btw
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 7:50 AM, mylenium@mylenium.de <mylenium@mylenium.de> wrote:
danny princz exposedideas.com |
