Return-Path: Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4891827 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:35:17 +0100 Return-Path: X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=RoZH3VaK c=1 sm=0 a=uGVV30z+85g2BU4jjhCGaw==:17 a=xo4Y4XuJRU4A:10 a=PatLW64MwJ0A:10 a=jGAE2KO9T2QA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=6DjYw-oQAAAA:8 a=CuD3rh-7-zMA:10 a=frDlyE_ag4r7areLa7gA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=uGVV30z+85g2BU4jjhCGaw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 72.225.231.129 Received: from [72.225.231.129] ([72.225.231.129:32963] helo=[10.0.1.5]) by hrndva-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id C9/D6-15169-8ED48905; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 23:38:16 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Subject: OT motion-banding artifact in footage From: Paul Dougherty In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 18:38:16 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9015E172-2445-483C-AB19-356B7107E0FB@postlit.com> References: To: "After Effects Mail List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) This is a follow-on post to my pulldown issue (removing pulldown in a = mystery video) - regarding this same YouTube video, I'm gathering that = the ghosting is 'baked into the cake' - I'd like to pivot to another = issue that is probably field (dominance) related. =20 Aside from the ghosting - I get another motion artifact in certain = viewing conditions- like a banding version of a field dominance problem. = A fast moving object has the staggered combing problem (staggered = bands) *but* not as individual video lines but rather as wider bands - = probably representing 10 or 15 lines of video.* I see this motion-banding artifact looking at this YouTube footage in = Final Cut and when I watch the resulting dvd I burned on a NTSC monitor = - yet not looking at the clip in the Quicktime Player *or* watching the = dvd on my MacBook - it's not there. What is the right name/description of this phenomena? I've seen it = around for years but never had a name for it. Thanks in advance, Paul *Any of you old enough to remember Quad banding the width of the bands = is about the same - but it's an entirely different issue of course. = Also the banding I'm referring to has nothing to do with solarization.=