Return-Path: Received: from relay01.pair.com ([209.68.5.15] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with SMTP id 4892677 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:24:24 +0100 Received: (qmail 95311 invoked from network); 6 Nov 2012 20:27:25 -0000 Received: from 71.13.6.186 (HELO ?192.168.1.6?) (71.13.6.186) by relay01.pair.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2012 20:27:25 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 71.13.6.186 Message-ID: <509972AA.6010703@fxtech.com> Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 14:27:22 -0600 From: Paul Miller User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] OT: Apple contemplating switching from Intel CPUs References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/6/2012 2:10 PM, Carey Dissmore wrote: > Looking ahead in a big-picture, macro sort of way, I see several things > being universally true for video production: > > Frame sizes, frame rates (at least on acquisition side), a sheer volume > of data will continue to increase. A lot. > > Computing power required to process that video data for editing, > effects, 3D, physics simulation and more will continue to increase. A lot. > > Storage subsystems and the infrastructure to move that data to where it > needs to go will need to increase dramatically as well. > > The point being, all this fascination with mobility, thin clients, low > power and small is fine as long as there is an acknowledgement that at > the other end of that is the need for very big, very serious horsepower > --- and just as importantly ---big data pipes. Hey, maybe SGI will come back! ;-) Or, more likely, the "market" will speak, and decide that crappy YouTube videos on their designer pocket devices will be the only media people want to consume. :-(