Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.219.41] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4895165 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 17:29:17 +0100 Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id k14so3758842oag.28 for ; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 08:32:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=tgbvCmZ+R/od4qBoT7Sdej0gG2NixUtN7Rrxz8a/0Ns=; b=TH1Src9CEc3KH+hz2keqQKUJljDDePvUILD/HTpDkz3xjgtpFH5VMJHV5bE5fpro4R YMinLwhXcjPQDvUZqg1yigv+Vc4YtTohcgKtqHZZ4hR2F3sFj7B6AG2T2auSdUcs695Y uXjgVmXnCCpP9PmP8dHpOpnIdI262x1uweyYIc0VuZfn/3VVsPLq7QX12CO1ZP3QQwIL b1xkktIXWus91oRFWtgM87Eiinr+P1LHjs06qsyNBswKGAecjo2MOGSNhMvt6bc1mHu2 nCgqB/MrzxtTqy8N8Vm/fLgafbaYLb3mr7vWZN2zgalDj9cNev9Oe0fZbwb0HBRUwdz7 53lA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.169.234 with SMTP id ah10mr8319364oec.12.1352478742997; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 08:32:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.12.74 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 08:32:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 08:32:22 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Electric Image is alive! From: Chris Biggs To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 That really brings back some memories and a few nightmares too. C On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:47 AM, wrote: > actually when I complained that I had spent $2500 they said well they had > people who had paid over $7000 for the software, my only thought was, "So > you have a history of screwing over users, good to know" They will never get > another dime from me. > > timt > > ________________________________ > From: "Richard Green" > > To: "After Effects Mail List" > Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2012 9:00:56 AM > > Subject: Re: [AE] Electric Image is alive! > > And here's where everyone (Tim S?) chimes in about spending $7000 on it > before the price dropped to $2500 for the Broadcast edition! Back then it > could only render phong - I remember raytracing being a big announcement, > forget GI! I don't think the images were misleading, the rendering was > great for it's time. Certainly Paul S was a master but you can't blame them > for putting the good stuff on their galleries. The new owner is another > master user of EI, a Brazilian guy, I forget the name but he's a bit of a > genius. I'd love to see it work out for him. > But that John Knoll quote on the new site is a bit misleading, the days of > him rendering the Star Wars reissue in EI are long gone. I don't think it'll > see much use on Ep 7! > I'm likewise on C4D, mainly rendering in Maxwell which surprises and > delights me every time I hit render. > > --- > Cheers > Rich > > www.loopcorp.com > > > On 8 November 2012 16:45, Jack Tunnicliffe wrote: >> >> Tim: >> >> You and I must have bought EI the same month. LOL. Sounds exactly like >> what we went through. We, too are on C4D these days. >> >> Jack Tunnicliffe >> Java Post Production >> www.javapost.ca >> >> >> >> On Nov 8, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Tim Thiessen wrote: >> >> Don't get me started - I bought EI 2.9.2 back in the day for $2500, 6 >> months later they dropped the price to $200 (or so) and when they wanted me >> to upgrade to v3.0 they had the nerve to ask for a $400 upgrade fee. Their >> marketing material were misleading in my option (they featured work by Paul >> Schbiteroff sp? - and there is no way I was getting that type of reflection >> or look out EI anytime soon) I switched to cinema 4d and vowed to never give >> another cent to EI. Of course I deserve some if not all of the blame for my >> purchase - I didn't try out the software (it was 1999 and downloading a >> whole program to try out was still a new idea) and I went against the advice >> of a friend who suggested C4D. >> >> Sorry for the rant >> Timt >> >> iPhone >> >> On Nov 8, 2012, at 6:10 AM, Jim Kanter wrote: >> >> EIAS has just released v9. >> http://www.eias3d.com/ >> >> > -- --------------------------------------- R.Christopher Biggs Digital Ronin