Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.219.41] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4895196 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 17:51:57 +0100 Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id k14so3782842oag.28 for ; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 08:55:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=IhICWwKUaUM7c2sOHhllpMVUYT0UB8kjujgfNZGy98w=; b=LCDnT1vjtjJ+kfbmiQybfT+eTYJGC9Hzb6yEHCt9Ebv7DDAeoWFVJZS4E9rDNaGhGb yKth40RVARScN3BLwuNdFq7xWLpS1ZbGjy1WCknRXXqyPLUZUdoM230JR2iqCzvBNr9D +zdPdawvsu+ZgU1EZsx7xSQvpG3jBAHw0AGWvserSnn3XIz1icbn+U8nt+aJ849iMA/y O6PAoVZn1mDyQlrsErnAMwYiAviL+1dDszPUgf8WmuURnUOkquIN2VjB+rEwyU4EwPv0 fA6oz/a7Rep1q1av91znI5dW6enJAGeERKhkIND9bMHJtIqPKjO79FO1aIiJWEtdLvev gCRg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.177.100 with SMTP id cp4mr9167242obc.71.1352480103492; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 08:55:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.160.41 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 08:55:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 11:55:03 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Cuda card update? From: rendernyc To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f838d9f226e5d04ce12d0e4 --e89a8f838d9f226e5d04ce12d0e4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 5XX are getting harder to find they use more power than the 6XX but also may be a bit faster depending on what you are doing AE currently uses up to 2GB per card of VRAM but i hope that goes up in the future. i would get a card with at leasdt 2GB of VRAM. I got the 2.5GB 570GTX a few months back... On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Paul Crisanti wrote: > That would work for me-Thanks again. I'll look for a vendor of the 680 and > see what the differences are between that and the 580. But the 580 would be > a great improvement. > ~p > > On Nov 9, 2012, at 10:43 AM, rendernyc wrote: > > That config works if you are just looking for CUDA performance. > > thats what im currently running > > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Paul Crisanti wrote: > >> Ah, thank you. >> So if I use my existing card for the monitor and the 570 or 680 for Cuda >> only (headless?), I'm cool then. Do I understand you right? >> ~p >> >> On Nov 09, 2012, at 10:32 AM, rendernyc wrote: >> >> macvidcards mods the cards so you have a proper boot screen. >> my card isnt connected to a monitor, just using it for CUDA, so theres no >> need if you are running headless. >> >> many people dont care, but if you want you can also send them your card >> to be modded >> >> 10.7.4 you have to install the nvidia driver for the quadro4000. >> in 10.8 i dont think you have to install anything >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Paul Crisanti wrote: >> >>> Thanks so much for your reply! >>> Do you know if the 680 needs to be modified? >>> I remember a thread talking about buying the 570 on eBay from a group >>> (name?) that modifies the card so its plug & play. >>> ~p >>> >>> On Nov 9, 2012, at 9:50 AM, rendernyc wrote: >>> >>> i have the 570 and it work great with premiere. this should be even >>> better. >>> for AE it will speed up the raytracer only on CS6 and any other plugins >>> that are CUDA or GPU aware. >>> but that speed up is huge >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Paul Crisanti wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, just seeing this, can I ask if this card would work well with a >>>> Mac Pro 6 core running 10.7? >>>> Looking for better Premiere & AE performance. >>>> Thank you! >>>> ~p >>>> >>>> On Nov 7, 2012, at 2:18 PM, rendernyc wrote: >>>> >>>> You can get the GTX680 4GB for $550ish >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Henry Birdseye < >>>> henry.birdseye@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm in a position to upgrade my video card (an FX 4800) to something >>>>> beefier for my PC. >>>>> >>>>> So, what would you recommend for about $600? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> +---End of message---+ >>>>> To unsubscribe send any message to >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> danny princz >>>> >>>> exposedideas.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> danny princz >>> >>> exposedideas.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> danny princz >> >> exposedideas.com >> >> > > > -- > danny princz > > exposedideas.com > > > -- danny princz exposedideas.com --e89a8f838d9f226e5d04ce12d0e4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 5XX are getting harder to find
they use more power than the 6XX but als= o may be a bit faster depending on what you are doing

<= div>AE currently uses up to 2GB per card of VRAM but i hope that goes up in= the future.
i would get a card with at leasdt 2GB of VRAM. I got the 2.5GB 570GTX = a few months back...


On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Paul Crisanti <paul@cri= santiandco.com> wrote:
That wou= ld work for me-Thanks again. I'll look for a vendor of the 680 and see = what the differences are between that and the 580. But the 580 would be a g= reat improvement.
~p

On Nov 9, 2= 012, at 10:43 AM, rendernyc wrote:

That = config works if you are just looking for CUDA performance.

thats what im currently running


On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Paul Crisanti <pau= l_eboy@me.com> wrote:
Ah, thank you.
So if I u= se my existing card for the monitor and the 570 or 680 for Cuda only (headl= ess?), I'm cool then. Do I understand you right?
~p

On Nov 09, 2012, at 10:32 AM, rend= ernyc <renderny= c@gmail.com> wrote:

macvidcards mods the cards so you have a proper boot screen.
<= /div>
my card isnt connected to a monitor, just using it for CUDA, so t= heres no need if you are running headless.

many pe= ople dont care, but if you want you can also send them your card to be modd= ed

10.7.4 you have to install the nvidia driver for the qu= adro4000.
in 10.8 i dont think you have to install anything
=




On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Paul Crisanti <paul@crisantiandco.co= m> wrote:
Thanks so much for your reply!
Do y= ou know if the 680 needs to be modified?
I remember a thread talk= ing about buying the 570 on eBay from a group (name?) that modifies the car= d so its plug & play.
~p

On Nov 9, 2012, at 9:50 AM, rende= rnyc wrote:

i have the 570 and it work g= reat with premiere. this should be even better.
for AE it will speed up= the raytracer only on CS6 and any other plugins that are CUDA or GPU aware= .
but that speed up is huge



On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:29 AM, = Paul Crisanti <paul@crisantiandco.com> wrote:
Hello, j= ust seeing this, can I ask if this card would work well with a Mac Pro 6 co= re running 10.7?
Looking for better Premiere & AE performance.
Thank you!
~p

On Nov 7, 2012, at 2:= 18 PM, rendernyc wrote:

You can get the = GTX680 4GB for $550ish




On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Henry Birdseye <henry.b= irdseye@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm in a position to upgrade my video ca= rd (an FX 4800) to something beefier for my PC.

So, what would you= recommend for about $600?





+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send an= y message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>



--
danny princz

exposedideas.com




--
danny p= rincz

exposedideas.com=

<= /div>


--
danny princz

exposedideas.com


--
danny princz

exposedideas.com




--
danny princz

exposedideas.com
--e89a8f838d9f226e5d04ce12d0e4--