Return-Path: Received: from nk11p03mm-asmtp006.mac.com ([17.158.232.41] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4895363 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 21:43:26 +0100 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_aW8TWuDUoadg7h9nWS5vZg)" Received: from [192.168.1.68] ([99.152.153.100]) by nk11p03mm-asmtp006.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Jan 3 2012)) with ESMTPSA id <0MD800L6QN18T090@nk11p03mm-asmtp006.mac.com> for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:46:22 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.9.8185,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2012-11-09_03:2012-11-09,2012-11-09,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1203120001 definitions=main-1211090206 From: Jim Curtis Subject: Re: [AE] NLE or AE Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 14:46:20 -0600 In-reply-to: To: After Effects Mail List References: Message-id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) --Boundary_(ID_aW8TWuDUoadg7h9nWS5vZg) Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable I routinely work in Pr linking to Ae comps for titling and MoGFX these = days, and I haven't noticed any differences in quality, whether using = Dynamic Linked Ae comps or rendered movies from Ae placed in a Pr = timeline. If I need advanced masking, I finish in Ae. And Ae has a better = keyframe graph editor than Pr. But, if I can do what I need in Pr with its native color effects, I = will, because of the real-time playback and the advantages of CUDA. Hats off to Adobe. Now that they've got the bugs more or less under = control, and we have more reliable broadcast monitoring via third party = hardware and drivers, the Production Premium CS is a powerhouse = post-production suite. On Nov 9, 2012, at 2:31 PM, Tupper, Scott (HQP) wrote: > With a lot of today=92s FX plugins working in both your NLE and AE, is = there really any advantage to using one over the other in terms of = render quality? > =20 > Just asking=85 > =20 > scott tupper | senior multimedia producer, media services > robert half international >=20 > =20 > =20 --Boundary_(ID_aW8TWuDUoadg7h9nWS5vZg) Content-type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable I routinely work in Pr linking to Ae comps for = titling and MoGFX these days, and I haven't noticed any differences in = quality, whether using Dynamic Linked Ae comps or rendered movies from = Ae placed in a Pr timeline.

If I need advanced = masking, I finish in Ae.  And Ae has a better keyframe graph = editor than Pr.

But, if I can do what I need in = Pr with its native color effects, I will, because of the real-time = playback and the advantages of CUDA.

Hats off = to Adobe.  Now that they've got the bugs more or less under = control, and we have more reliable broadcast monitoring via third party = hardware and drivers, the Production Premium CS is a powerhouse = post-production = suite.




On Nov 9, 2012, at 2:31 PM, Tupper, Scott (HQP) wrote:

With = a lot of today=92s FX plugins working in both your NLE and AE, is there = really any advantage to using one over the other in terms of render = quality?
Just = asking=85
 senior multimedia producer, media = services
robert half = international