Return-Path: Received: from nm28.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.91.98] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4895367 for ae-list@media-motion.tv; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 21:44:36 +0100 Received: from [72.30.22.93] by nm28.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Nov 2012 20:47:42 -0000 Received: from [98.139.44.77] by tm15.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Nov 2012 20:47:42 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1014.access.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Nov 2012 20:47:42 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 67909.95587.bm@omp1014.access.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 32457 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Nov 2012 20:47:41 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1352494061; bh=H/ysU0f5yrF+xgIJSuBnldRx6wDLlwtdrY1MSzNdUrg=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=e0kGm2mzb05pM+lSufFlm9YmYOPVJTlB52MSL+OC5z4IuYT1nm3FsYXKbLXOVRBzt1WCANjQdWB5LRYbLk9H2Mv0TqFVpk5iTXk1jOFAVrcgCVLwYtF6PLJ/fZ3PRDA2jtbXeJ7W11TeOYSV+evVMAcS0lMvyGenk4bQYiCuBz8= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=oKRD8X4JnVRPqNmlIIgSoaW/DsOENxGBwwYTBy+cN16D0j/1wnm59R1LYN6OSseDdFEQ0LCpRx64cKtpz58GckKbdz46dseN92t4PxpdOWDuBQWOrs3YLDjftu8Oc/LJBIPJeEB37aClQnedTJM9qMiGlRMy5dNk51e44UBJl2o=; X-YMail-OSG: IEoGh3AVM1kIYWYuL5FuGaTr_u5OD6Y8GszwLMnxbVtKLfZ OaVE- Received: from [66.227.68.178] by web84514.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 12:47:41 PST X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001,CgptYXliZSB0aGUgcmVuZGVyIHF1YWxpdHkgaXMgdGhlIHNhbWUuLi5idXQsIEkgd291bGQgbmV2ZXIgdXNlIG15IE5MRSBmb3IgYW55dGhpbmcgYnV0IHJvdWdoIGNvbXBvc2l0aW5nL2dmeCBhbmQgSSB3b3VsZCBuZXZlciB1c2UgQUUgZm9yIGFueXRoaW5nIGJ1dCBxdWljayBhbmQgZGlydHkgZWRpdHMuwqDCoAoKTWlrZSBDYXJkZWlybwpFZGl0b3IvQW5pbWF0b3IvQ29tcG9zaXRvcsKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgIApENCBDcmVhdGl2ZSBHcm91cCAtIFBoaWxhZGVscGhpYSwgUEEBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.123.460 References: Message-ID: <1352494061.32422.YahooMailNeo@web84514.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 12:47:41 -0800 (PST) From: mike cardeiro Reply-To: mike cardeiro Subject: Re: [AE] NLE or AE To: After Effects Mail List In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="750031334-1736644786-1352494061=:32422" --750031334-1736644786-1352494061=:32422 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0A=0Amaybe the render quality is the same...but, I would never use my NLE = for anything but rough compositing/gfx and I would never use AE for anythin= g but quick and dirty edits.=C2=A0=C2=A0=0A=0AMike Cardeiro=0AEditor/Animat= or/Compositor=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =0AD4 Creative Group - Philadelphia, P= A=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =0A=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =0Ahttp://www.michaelcardeiro.com/resume/ =0A=0A=0A=0A=0A= =0A=0A>________________________________=0A> From: "Tupper, Scott (HQP)" =0A>To: After Effects Mail List =0A>Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 3:31 PM=0A>Subject: [AE] NLE or AE=0A>= =0A>=0A> =0A>With a lot of today=E2=80=99s FX plugins working in both your= NLE and AE, is there really any advantage to using one over the other in t= erms of render quality?=0A>=C2=A0=0A>Just asking=E2=80=A6=0A>=C2=A0=0A>scot= t tupper=C2=A0|=C2=A0senior=C2=A0multimedia producer, media services=0A>rob= ert half international=0A>=0A>=0A>=C2=A0=0A>=C2=A0=0A>=0A> --750031334-1736644786-1352494061=:32422 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

maybe the render quality is the same...but, I would never= use my NLE for anything but rough compositing/gfx and I would never use AE= for anything but quick and dirty edits.  

<= span>
Mike Cardeiro
Editor/Animator/Compositor&nb= sp;            =    
D4 Creative Group - Philadelphia, PA  &nbs= p;
           
http://www.michaelcardeiro.com/resume/


<= blockquote style=3D"border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5= px; margin-top: 5px; padding-left: 5px;">
From: "Tupper, Scott (HQP)" <scott.tup= per@rhi.com>
To: Af= ter Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Sent: Friday, November 9, 2012 3:31 PM Subject: [AE] NLE or AE=

=0A
=0A=0A =0A =0A=0A=0A
=0A
=0A
With a lot of today=E2=80=99s FX plugi= ns working in both your NLE and AE, is there really any advantage to using = one over the other in terms of render quality?
=0A
=  
=0A
Just asking=E2=80=A6
=0A  
=0A
scott tupper | senior multimedia=0A producer, media services
=0A
robert half international
=0A
=0A
=0A
 =
=0A
=0A
 
=0A
=0A=0A
=0A=0A


--750031334-1736644786-1352494061=:32422--