Return-Path: Received: from mail-ee0-f41.google.com ([74.125.83.41] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4895492 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 23:54:26 +0100 Received: by mail-ee0-f41.google.com with SMTP id c4so2474756eek.28 for ; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 14:57:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:user-agent :mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-tagtoolbar-keys :content-type; bh=cMgCPl0fiKH0B+mpwKOVRP0lD91KBUgI+nBAWCt0GQ0=; b=hSwr/s6xSDiDWTKL/FDE1zHrywE4ejrBCxqKTosPei15wLfIAqaQx6e4dcC0vAAoZE c35mY/ecoD2spW1t0FRnzuL9HPgt3cwIXY8t1q+X/zhufx5MGFpY2ohl+3Wmi+pn64c4 j9evc7rrxDsVHJA9Eoy+sX8SUSNd7bWaj1h59ehLnB99L37U0RWGQOqmARI1qoaLHmmC yAgPPlT5CwMQqPxhHQo65y3iPFYEN84OjN3sx6Yw1XBz2Fi0Ak0oXpNFindvZqYaT0BK nK+S5Th+4Xy5DRpfrhQ76x9w4hZe/ugI02ce20qX86LWs3oy0sqyqStrazfK13y+R9qS mvEA== Received: by 10.14.178.195 with SMTP id f43mr41387618eem.44.1352501853957; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 14:57:33 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.4] (cust-233-240.on4.ontelecoms.gr. [92.118.233.240]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s1sm79174070eem.9.2012.11.09.14.57.32 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 09 Nov 2012 14:57:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <509D8A9B.2060504@gmail.com> Disposition-Notification-To: Evan Fotis Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 00:58:35 +0200 From: Evan Fotis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.17) Gecko/20080914 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.17 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] NLE or AE References: In-Reply-To: X-TagToolbar-Keys: D20121110005835352 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050301050606090907000602" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050301050606090907000602 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Although a feature in PR, I find time it consuming adjusting the independent zoom level of effect controls TL. I would find it more useful in AE where a whole load of fx are usually applied, so the expanded layer could get very high and there, an independent effect control panel with it own TL would be of use, but in PR it would be much easier if the fx expanded under the video a la AE. On 09-Nov-12 22:46, Jim Curtis wrote: > I routinely work in Pr linking to Ae comps for titling and MoGFX these > days, and I haven't noticed any differences in quality, whether using > Dynamic Linked Ae comps or rendered movies from Ae placed in a Pr > timeline. > > If I need advanced masking, I finish in Ae. And Ae has a better > keyframe graph editor than Pr. > > But, if I can do what I need in Pr with its native color effects, I > will, because of the real-time playback and the advantages of CUDA. > > Hats off to Adobe. Now that they've got the bugs more or less under > control, and we have more reliable broadcast monitoring via third > party hardware and drivers, the Production Premium CS is a powerhouse > post-production suite. > > > > > On Nov 9, 2012, at 2:31 PM, Tupper, Scott (HQP) wrote: > >> With a lot of today�s FX plugins working in both your NLE and AE, is >> there really any advantage to using one over the other in terms of >> render quality? >> Just asking� >> *scott tupper***| senior multimedia producer, media services >> robert half international* >> >> * > --------------050301050606090907000602 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Although a feature in PR, I find time it consuming adjusting the independent zoom level of effect controls TL. I would find it more useful in AE where a whole load of fx are usually applied, so the expanded layer could get very high and there, an independent effect control panel with it own TL would be of use, but in PR it would be much easier if the fx expanded under the video a la AE.

On 09-Nov-12 22:46, Jim Curtis wrote:
I routinely work in Pr linking to Ae comps for titling and MoGFX these days, and I haven't noticed any differences in quality, whether using Dynamic Linked Ae comps or rendered movies from Ae placed in a Pr timeline.

If I need advanced masking, I finish in Ae.  And Ae has a better keyframe graph editor than Pr.

But, if I can do what I need in Pr with its native color effects, I will, because of the real-time playback and the advantages of CUDA.

Hats off to Adobe.  Now that they've got the bugs more or less under control, and we have more reliable broadcast monitoring via third party hardware and drivers, the Production Premium CS is a powerhouse post-production suite.




On Nov 9, 2012, at 2:31 PM, Tupper, Scott (HQP) wrote:

With a lot of today�s FX plugins working in both your NLE and AE, is there really any advantage to using one over the other in terms of render quality?
 
Just asking�
 
scott tupper | senior multimedia producer, media services
robert half international

 
 


--------------050301050606090907000602--