Mailing List AE-List@media-motion.tv — Message #46549
From: Evan Fotis <evan.fotis@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AE] NLE or AE
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 00:58:35 +0200
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
 Message Header

Undecoded Message
Although a feature in PR, I find time it consuming adjusting the independent zoom level of effect controls TL. I would find it more useful in AE where a whole load of fx are usually applied, so the expanded layer could get very high and there, an independent effect control panel with it own TL would be of use, but in PR it would be much easier if the fx expanded under the video a la AE.

On 09-Nov-12 22:46, Jim Curtis wrote:
I routinely work in Pr linking to Ae comps for titling and MoGFX these days, and I haven't noticed any differences in quality, whether using Dynamic Linked Ae comps or rendered movies from Ae placed in a Pr timeline.

If I need advanced masking, I finish in Ae.  And Ae has a better keyframe graph editor than Pr.

But, if I can do what I need in Pr with its native color effects, I will, because of the real-time playback and the advantages of CUDA.

Hats off to Adobe.  Now that they've got the bugs more or less under control, and we have more reliable broadcast monitoring via third party hardware and drivers, the Production Premium CS is a powerhouse post-production suite.




On Nov 9, 2012, at 2:31 PM, Tupper, Scott (HQP) wrote:

With a lot of today�s FX plugins working in both your NLE and AE, is there really any advantage to using one over the other in terms of render quality?
 
Just asking�
 
scott tupper | senior multimedia producer, media services
robert half international

 
 


 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to ListMaster