Return-Path: Received: from mout.perfora.net ([74.208.4.195] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4895614 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 04:27:37 +0100 Received: from mbp-17.westell.com (50-55-11-251.waus.wi.frontiernet.net [50.55.11.251]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Lxh11-1THjuk2hYZ-0173j8; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 22:30:43 -0500 From: Steve Oakley Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_815A32AF-573D-40C2-82EB-CC5B9557128B" Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: [AE] NLE or AE Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 21:30:40 -0600 References: To: "After Effects Mail List" In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:disJqibH5Tbojqg64MnsFu8ZbqBIZebwkINFLAuIsPW OLnLn24oq8CUrFyQ4rKQwkpaWAhwfumeVrEifkFb+oQJcrwXXv mSeICV6FHmEqXIivWmSOPwnOKx3c9cvRIv/DuXgtrLI4q64Ele 8zvNFh92PnpAstc8uAmLwf/f2pC8gr8N7j8Xh7SWzYX0A5dvEm Kj26D4ONVdTpXN72aP59BYmmGy1qYcAyxQAxduO5Sx/q0uQecq ggdPUiPSoBaIP3ikI4Wp3cupEgjkUPoWZM6EryibGsftWbOy/2 SNsXX+bfdpe2zofKW5UX+V1OO3HV6sFfdferCV3KraVTkwA/51 b4Nj7U54sT/YALE1tFbNt6e/txR5D9Xm1zwVcFkBUAJyCSPQhX QlOAZtuma4DCg== --Apple-Mail=_815A32AF-573D-40C2-82EB-CC5B9557128B Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii it so depends. I do simple comps in PP all the time because its RT with = CUDA. I can even add a few filters like blurs, CC's, CK's, motion tab, = and its still all RT. I can't begin to say how vastly more productive = that is. I've normally got 3-6 layers going at any given time in my TL + = a few fx and CUDA is just a pleasure. make changes, hit play, make = changes, hit play. no waiting around for renders, or guessing at really = low res / low FPS FCP type previews.... and of course smoke is NLE + = compositor in one. S On Nov 9, 2012, at 8:20 PM, Rich Young wrote: >=20 > In Premiere you can put the Effects panel in with the sequences, as = another Tab. It's AE 1.0 stye but it gives you more room. It's not as = quick for some things of course. >=20 > Rich >=20 >=20 > --- On Fri, 11/9/12, Evan Fotis wrote: > Although a feature in PR, I find time it consuming adjusting the = independent zoom level of effect controls TL. I would find it more = useful in AE where a whole load of fx are usually applied, so the = expanded layer could get very high and there, an independent effect = control panel with it own TL would be of use, but in PR it would be much = easier if the fx expanded under the video a la AE. --Apple-Mail=_815A32AF-573D-40C2-82EB-CC5B9557128B Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii it so = depends. I do simple comps in PP all the time because its RT with CUDA. = I can even add a few filters like blurs, CC's, CK's, motion tab, and its = still all RT. I can't begin to say how vastly more productive that is. = I've normally got 3-6 layers going at any given time in my TL + a few fx = and CUDA is just a pleasure. make changes, hit play, make changes, hit = play. no waiting around for renders, or guessing at really low res / low = FPS FCP type previews.... and of course smoke is NLE + compositor in = one.

S

On Nov 9, 2012, at = 8:20 PM, Rich Young <aefilter@yahoo.com> = wrote:

In = Premiere you can put the Effects panel in with the sequences, as another = Tab. It's AE 1.0 stye but it gives you more room. It's not as quick for = some things of course.

Rich


--- On Fri, 11/9/12, Evan = Fotis <evan.fotis@gmail.com> = wrote:
Although a feature in PR, I find = time it consuming adjusting the independent zoom level of effect controls TL. I would find it more useful in AE where a whole load of fx are usually applied, so the expanded layer could get very high and there, an independent effect control panel with it own TL would be of use, but in PR it would be much easier if the fx expanded under the video a la = AE.

= --Apple-Mail=_815A32AF-573D-40C2-82EB-CC5B9557128B--