Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4897412 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 00:19:18 +0100 Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id p5so4639446lag.28 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:22:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Tsa1GlzBG4q3bOm9XheHDc02srll+T0Xz76WiWz38fU=; b=u2NUPojxC22SIJBqjZDFVBgHbPYrm34xsnam52JG7Zdu7vfGFqCZg1+iF5J9z+q2UM Y6iG0xGVnzRfDP11iBD09TL6/M2vy3awEcz1XdMti3lTypMMwTKR/bFsIQoZYg2douv3 yP/6aSHJLMl0Qk0s+hYXvHjN4XZhN4Nqac8elRCTOzip1lw35TEABNmazRw7fvvb8kXj DfCdmP2SNqI7Xuum+obqdyFlLaqrQ69hDuzLP57sQ8o3Mp7ivFVDMzexik2g1diaoyoH lNXoSCcF4EgS3b53dn4KhZVOk2vRwGaiVXM8KHPiUac1gD18O82Ddedifxn+pF426ve5 WH4w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.147.100 with SMTP id tj4mr3920530lab.42.1352762551882; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:22:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.44.67 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:22:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.44.67 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:22:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:22:31 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] best server setup for small studio (10-15 macs / imacs / laptops) From: Teddy Gage To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f22bd895ed21304ce54932e --e89a8f22bd895ed21304ce54932e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yeah I was thinking a wireless for backup only. But I think its a shame there's no good cheap wireless infrastructure for servers. what is top end wifi right now like 300mbs? And I'd have to set it up ad-hoc On Nov 12, 2012 5:48 PM, "Rendernyc" wrote: > I would never ever suggest wireless for a server connection on a > workstation. > > If u have a wifi based server nothing else will really matter bc that's > going to be the bottleneck. > > On Nov 12, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Teddy Gage wrote: > > with all the mac mini talk I noticed a lot of people use them as servers. > Would love to get input on what configs work - what would be the fastest / > cheapest theoretical wireless setup for a server? or if going wired how > important is the switch quality? If I went mac mini with a RAID would a > lacie thunderbolt big drive raid be fast / stable enough? > > -- > Animator & Editor > www.teddygage.com > Brooklyn > > --e89a8f22bd895ed21304ce54932e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yeah I was thinking a wireless for backup only. But I think = its a shame there's no good cheap wireless infrastructure for servers. = what is top end wifi right now like 300mbs? And I'd have to set it up a= d-hoc

On Nov 12, 2012 5:48 PM, "Rendernyc" &= lt;rendernyc@gmail.com> wrote= :
I would never ever suggest wireless for a server con= nection on a workstation.=A0

If u have a wifi base= d server nothing else will really matter bc that's going to be the bott= leneck.=A0

On Nov 12, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Teddy Gage <teddygage@gmail.com> wrote:
with all the mac mini talk I noticed= a lot of people use them as servers. Would love to get input on what confi= gs work - what would be the fastest / cheapest theoretical wireless setup f= or a server? or if going wired how important is the switch quality? If I we= nt mac mini with a RAID would a lacie thunderbolt big drive raid be fast / = stable enough?

--
Animator & Editor
www.teddygage.com<= /span>
Brooklyn

--e89a8f22bd895ed21304ce54932e--