Return-Path: Received: from atl4mhob05.myregisteredsite.com ([209.17.115.43] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4897561 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:15:08 +0100 Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by atl4mhob05.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qAD7IKkV016835 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 02:18:20 -0500 Received: from webmail39 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailpod.hostingplatform.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id qAD7IK81011075 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 02:18:20 -0500 Received: from 59.167.240.84 (chris@chriszwar.com [59.167.240.84]) by webmail39 (Netsol 11.2.30) with WEBMAIL id 11072; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 07:18:20 +0000 From: "Chris Zwar" To: "After Effects Mail List" Importance: Normal Sensitivity: Normal Message-ID: X-Mailer: Network Solutions Webmail, Build 11.2.30 X-Originating-IP: [59.167.240.84] X-Forwarded-For: [(null)] X-Authenticated-UID: chris@chriszwar.com Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 07:18:20 +0000 Subject: Re: [AE] Semi OT: Yet another mac mini render farm thread MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We have a decent render farm running Deadline (for everything, Max, Maya,= C4D, AE). The guys here have done a few tests with Mac Minis and basica= lly concluded that they work, provided they have enough ram - but that's = normal. They didn't run into any specific issues related to Mac Mini. They're planning on building a portable mac-mini Deadline render farm in = a flight case. The cost of shipping Mac Pros is prohibitive when you hav= e a lot of them - something like the Helmer render farm but using a fligh= t case and not the IKEA cabinet would be much cheaper to transport than e= ven a few Mac Pros, yet much much more powerful. I was just reading the Ars Technica review of the latest Mac Mini and was= disappointed to see they've dropped the option of a discrete graphics ca= rd. This means it's not possible to drop in something that would boost C= uda performance, and in the long term this seriously diminishes their app= eal as rendering and desktop graphics machines. The new iMacs, for examp= le, have a high-end graphics card option which is quite capable - but the= minis are stuck with Intels crappy integrated graphics. Not so much a p= roblem for After Effects prior to CS6, but a big problem for anything 3D = and anything that takes advantage of Cuda etc etc. http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/11/review-the-mac-mini-takes-the-ivy-br= idge-to-fusion-town/ -Chris -----Original Message----- From: Nathan Shipley [mailto:nshipley@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 04:53 AM To: 'After Effects Mail List' Subject: Re: [AE] Semi OT: Yet another mac mini render farm thread Hey Tony - Pondering this myself. Just curious if you ever collected any useful answers or found some relevant information about a render farm with the latest Minis. Anything? Thanks! - Nathan On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Tony Romain wrote: > So this has come up in the past, wanted to get opinions from the > technorati out there (I'm looking in your direction Tim Sassoon, I thin= k > you built one a few years back, yes?) > > Have been toying with building a mac mini render farm, mostly for cinem= a > 4d. With the just released i7 quad core mac minis=85 thinking it could= be a > pretty great option. I know you can probably get more bang for your bu= ck > building a PC based version from scratch. But one of my concerns, bein= g in > a relatively small studio space is power consumption and heat, which I > think makes a mac mini a good option. > > Just not sure how stable they are for sustained multi hour usage on the= > processors=85. > > > Any thoughts? > > > > -- > *tony romain* *|* *principal/creative director* > > *trance* > *motion graphic animation and design* > 323 651 1114 > www.trancedesigns.com >