Return-Path: Received: from mail-vb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4914789 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:13:12 +0100 Received: by mail-vb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id l22so2070288vbn.28 for ; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:17:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=i8ZonKDOnc6DJuMo53j7Vdmfto1aOCgl6VZm37n1aBg=; b=BL+vcA4m+Vt4QOeayGZlJwnL47TwJcMK0s8Lz3KTtUTi7TmMqaoSACaxbvLlvy+DRm aKnP9tZZTWsV97TDJgf68XEqKTYYnO45LmLE3R0uTgIe0Nm6FAXU0XXFwA8hiOWqIPgg FipYeLN+mi5vpm/kzD3u03CKXtaqcXt7yBO5XJxsCP0plVAghYHASMHffwz5gvLdKIdi nFunTdB0qUDTtVVpgjyNNMVP0O1VnC/zLpFeQSsLX3oDeLE0wnl4NIintB2ZWrwf9J2e R8iXirNtkukp/QqzllSWuZKyWy54TvwTa/jYDfvKbA5EA4Q88Oa72hyT4MQNRMktMPiw +4pA== Received: by 10.52.98.196 with SMTP id ek4mr8772364vdb.38.1354576624312; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 15:17:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: hedczech@gmail.com Received: by 10.58.170.39 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 15:16:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: "scott.aelist" Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 15:16:24 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: CXTzEoU1rkrAyiBTHMU4Y0yMqpY Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] top feature requests for After Effects in 2012 To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307ac86d83624004cffaf2fb --20cf307ac86d83624004cffaf2fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think the layers paradigm is fine for 2d compositing, but I find it very clumsy and non-intuitive when working in 3D space. If AE plans to grow in the 3D direction, I don't see how will succeed with the layer model interface alone. AE already has it's toes in nodes with the Flowchart view. I don't see how it would alienate the userbase to simply add some basic editing functionality to that workspace. > Remember, everyone, that in addition to having the conversation on this forum, you need to submit the feature requests here if you don't want them to evaporate into the ether I think I voted for nodes/ubertwirl several cycles ago. Should we resubmit FR's if they are not implemented with new releases? --20cf307ac86d83624004cffaf2fb Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think the layers paradigm is fine for 2d compositing, but I find it very = clumsy and non-intuitive when working in 3D space. If AE plans to grow in t= he 3D direction, I don't see how will succeed with the layer model inte= rface alone. AE already has it's toes in nodes with the Flowchart view.= I don't see how it would alienate the userbase to simply add some basi= c editing functionality to that workspace.

> Remember, everyone, that in addition to having the conversation o= n=20 this forum, you need to submit the feature requests here if you don't= =20 want them to evaporate into the ether

I think I voted for nodes/ubertwirl several cycles ago. Should we resub= mit FR's if they are not implemented with new releases?
--20cf307ac86d83624004cffaf2fb--