Return-Path: Received: from atl4mhob13.myregisteredsite.com ([209.17.115.51] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 4914825 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 01:44:31 +0100 Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by atl4mhob13.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qB40mOCR032245 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 19:48:24 -0500 Received: from webmail36 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailpod.hostingplatform.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id qB40mOEf017863 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 19:48:24 -0500 Received: from 59.167.240.84 (chris@chriszwar.com [59.167.240.84]) by webmail36 (Netsol 11.2.30) with WEBMAIL id 17825; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:48:24 +0000 From: "Chris Zwar" To: "After Effects Mail List" Importance: Normal Sensitivity: Normal Message-ID: X-Mailer: Network Solutions Webmail, Build 11.2.30 X-Originating-IP: [59.167.240.84] X-Forwarded-For: [(null)] X-Authenticated-UID: chris@chriszwar.com Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 00:48:24 +0000 Subject: Re: [AE] top feature requests for After Effects in 2012 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I didn't think it was a rant, maybe it was a train of thought that got de= -railed ;-) I was thinking about two separate comments, firstly that node-based compo= siting is a top feature request, and secondly that Nuke and After Effects= might be competitors. Although separate, I was thinking about the poten= tial for Adobe to implement node-based compositing as an attempt to compe= te with Nuke. And I totally understand that this was not what you said! I suspect that at least some of the people who are requesting nodes in AE= are wanting After Effects to become Nuke, or hold some hope that it woul= d open new markets to them. I think this is wrong and it was to this tho= ught - which I totally understand is not what you meant - that I responde= d about the markets being different. And I didn't mean to imply that adding nodes to After Effects would alien= tate existing users, what I meant was that diverting resources away from = features that would be more useful would annoy existing users. I would b= e really p****d if Adobe wasted resources on a linux port when we still d= on't have a colour swatch palette or a histogram in the curves effect. -Chris -----Original Message----- From: Tim Sassoon [mailto:tsassoon@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 11:20 AM To: 'After Effects Mail List' Subject: Re: [AE] top feature requests for After Effects in 2012 That's what I mean by competition (Nuke). Though I don't think there's mo= re than maybe a 30% functional overlap between them. AE will never be the= hardcore nodal 3D compositor that Nuke is, and Nuke probably isn't anyon= e's first choice for text animation. Chris, you took off on a tear withou= t actually reading what I wrote, which is pretty much the opposite of wha= t your rant assumed. I say, strengthen the things which make AE unique, w= hich is as a CREATIVE platform. Which is why I said brushes and fonts. Ho= w many other apps can one create really beautiful work quickly, often wit= hout any external sources? Make it so that a generalist needs to know BOT= H. Tim Sassoon SFD Santa Monica, CA On Dec 3, 2012, at 3:02 PM, rendernyc wrote: > i have seen several of these companies that were using AE for comping s= lowly switching completely away from AE on many projects