Return-Path: Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com ([209.85.212.54] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4916650 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 21:51:39 +0100 Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l1so5738566vba.27 for ; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 12:55:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=GwNvMNS9+rrgq/6xBsPNftcDTXZAx8LvpBrKCOn0sUc=; b=D2591DAk7Sk8NkEPUfyCEmL+VA8oEc1KuObPu9NVQ3gA81rDuKBXXA1tuJkoqf1jWh R1NCgdp6eGsC6L2Nv+sDt9zyrMc+O6/HvbYSUla36aTOnzwnJys+/brS9w1nCOaDW8Fv oA/1UzwjScHJ6v0PVikPbfV8COi8GmiQnP8gKWJqbUwo6R+4Kr3ok2HF5P6xGC9xw5K6 zHgvoroXb2EMORM1rOWZxYJxRdL6r074p+/3txrGQp4tYqYuW1mIyGwrIF6siteeL6l2 OkcbjH/Y5pYOERN3yVwfvpPjphmR5hBPA0Xj1p/hV6oGnlXABXARL106d79yje/+sMJv X0tg== Received: by 10.58.198.135 with SMTP id jc7mr12850435vec.51.1354654533078; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 12:55:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: hedczech@gmail.com Received: by 10.58.170.39 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 12:54:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: "scott.aelist" Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 12:54:52 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: MKlQ9jLA7YPe1XNtauEOfFZXSkg Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] top feature requests for After Effects in 2012 To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d8cd73cce7c04d00d1696 --047d7b5d8cd73cce7c04d00d1696 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm surprised more people don't reference C4D in AE feature requests, particularly the mograph module. A simple animation with the cloner and effectors is almost impossible to duplicate in AE. --047d7b5d8cd73cce7c04d00d1696 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm surprised more people don't reference C4D in AE feature requests, particularly the mograph module. A simple animation with the cloner and effectors is almost impossible to duplicate in AE.
--047d7b5d8cd73cce7c04d00d1696--