Return-Path: Received: from omta3.brinkster.com ([65.182.109.103] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4918745 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 03:44:17 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by omta3.brinkster.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5FD1C11B71 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 19:47:59 -0700 (MST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at omta3.brinkster.com Received: from omta3.brinkster.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (omta3.brinkster.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6MzROwBspi-v for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 19:47:59 -0700 (MST) Received: from mta8.brinkster.com (unknown [65.182.109.87]) by omta3.brinkster.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FA8D1C117D2 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 19:47:59 -0700 (MST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mta8.brinkster.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2274C80E7 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 21:47:43 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mta8.brinkster.com Received: from mta8.brinkster.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta8.brinkster.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tauAliuLPFkk for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 21:47:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail5c.brinkster.com (mail5c.brinkster.com [10.0.6.192]) by mta8.brinkster.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7759C4C80C4 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 21:47:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 19:47:34 -0700 (MST) From: "Roland Kahlenberg (RoRK)" To: After Effects Mail List Message-ID: <27355498.66051.1354848453999.JavaMail.root@mail5c.brinkster.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [AE] top feature requests for After Effects in 2012 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [220.255.1.126] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.6_GA_2332.RHEL4 (ZimbraWebClient - SAF3 (Win)/6.0.6_GA_2324.RHEL5) A 'better 3D environment' is ambiguous and actually incorrect since most plugins live in their own 3D space. I'm actually looking at a true 3D environment for layers as well as plugins/effects. Lots of time it takes only 2-4 hours to set up a complex/interesting scene/stage BUT many, many hours more to work around the limitations of a lack of a true 3D environment. As for Newton, it only works with 2D layers and it still does strange things to my UI even with their update for CS6. For Feature Requests, I'm wondering if the FR list can be made more accessible for more users, especially those like me who have issues putting their thoughts, linearly and logically. I'm thinking of a publicly accessible (after signing-in) list where folks can click, for each item on the list, on a checkbox for a YES/NO vote. A column for remarks/comments would also be nice. HTH - Roland Kahlenberg Intensive mocha & AE Training in Singapore and Other Dangerous Locations Imagineer Systems (mocha) Certified Instructor & Adobe After Effects ACE/ACI (version 7) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Todd Kopriva" To: "After Effects Mail List" Sent: Friday, December 7, 2012 10:25:14 AM Subject: Re: [AE] top feature requests for After Effects in 2012 > I'm quite surprised that folks aren't asking for a built-in physics > engine and a true 3D environment. I think that the requests for 3D object import and better integration with 3D applications imply a lot regarding a better 3D environment. And we have Newton for the former, which seems to satisfy many folks. +---End of message---+ To unsubscribe send any message to