| ||||||||||
my card did it in 18min 43sec. Not to good then. I've got a Asus 680 GTX with 4 Gb of ram. kind regards, Marcel van Berk Hoge Bomen/LSSLSS Van: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] Namens rendernyc heres the chart On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Robert Kjettrup <robert@stvmayday.dk> wrote: Yes, my K5000 took ~22 min and according to Danny the GTX680 is about ~15min, so that does tell that the K5000 is a underclocked 680. at least the openGL performance in Cinebench (and Softimage that i use) is good :-D - Robert 2012/12/13 rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com> Seems the CUDA performance of the K5000 is much lower than the GTX680 so far on Roberts test. Anyone else have a K5000 that can spare 15-20 minutes to run the test? On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Dave Bittner <dave@pixelworkshop.com> wrote: On the issue of lower OpenGL performance from the GTX series of cards, I did some research, and the conclusion seems to be that NVidia did some internal bandwidth bottlenecking on the GTX cards to keep them from competing with the much more expensive Quadro series. As gaming cards, the GTX series is designed to get images rendered to the screen quickly, but for OpenGL it is limited in getting those rendered images back to the CPU, which is what we need for graphics work. The CUDA pipes are wide open, from what I could find.
+---End of message---+ -- -- |
