Return-Path: Received: from mail-qc0-f169.google.com ([209.85.216.169] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4924666 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 22:26:32 +0100 Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t2so2048182qcq.28 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:30:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Pjvmz5pEhapeESOAYZq6WWyUOPnESWnJ0v4w38QjnEI=; b=iEmr+GbI5JZV5aLTTxPWdy1GZAMQPRLsg/HalYtXHlko0QN0PbmAGM9zoa2UIaM2iQ VZYw8+h1ZAvzC0fRLN5XlatoLQhf1FmetVoK/WCur/9gkm2b96E9zisvoXGH6c0nvmzx YTjQTOxY0yK1M98QbB4lWMyhciuNR0juvMLzphYdaHc+lOWhOs2Fi93wNnG1fD/4iwIs BDazxSQsiT8fAGFIjsEjleEO8eP9G/SYEJ0jfi2coLKOXkmltbC0Jbu7QAogqUul+q66 JphlfGUB47bI7zjDHL3LKYUnnFBF//AUziw+fCJdJqGNv5fXKVGHqlSsfJk0ae5ZNY0V Z3uw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.223.80 with SMTP id ij16mr1659464qab.8.1355434243490; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:30:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.60.131 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:30:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:30:43 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] 32core benchmarks From: Teddy Gage To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3074b54c99855404d0c2a006 --20cf3074b54c99855404d0c2a006 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Yes over clocking the CPU definitely speeds up the ram bus, on top of which I have quad channel memory in just the four quad channel slots (4x8gb sticks 1600 MHz) on this mobo. If all ram slots are filled, the memory bandwidth is decreased dramatically, so it's a balance between speed, over clocking, price and capacity. As you can see by Danny's charts, Cuda performance is definitely gimped on the 680 vs the 580. I have a 580 3gb card in my secondary render box that blows away the 680. Sadly it has no 3 monitor support so the 680 is in my main workstation. I'd highly recommend buying up a 580 or 590 on eBay as they are currently the best price / performance cards for Cuda right now. Not to mention easily overclocked out of the box with the manufacturers software. On Wednesday, December 12, 2012, Robert Kjettrup wrote: > Hi > > Just for fun i tried running my new 16core (32 threads) Z820 through some > of these tests, and comparing it there also seems to be some odd numbers > for your GPU in cineBench. I have the new Quadro K5000 that as far as i > know is a lower clocked version of the GTX680 you have in your machine, but > my OpenGL fps number are much higher. I only got the K5000 because i have > had some bad experience with my former GTX card that just crashed the > OpenGL driver when it was under load for longer periods. Would have gone > with the GTX680 if i trusted the gamer cards more, but "known" stability > was prioritised. > > CineBench scores: > OpenGL 81.45 fps > CPU 25.07 pts > > And running GeekBench (the free 32bit version) i can see that Teddy has > some impressive memory numbers, higher than i get. Is the memory linked to > the CPU clock frequency also? 4.5Ghz is a bit higher than my 3.1Ghz :-D > > Integer Processor integer performance 32414 > Floating Point Processor floating point performance 42123 > Memory Memory performance 7071 > Stream Memory bandwidth performance 8585 > Geekbench score: 28360 > > not to show off, but i thought some of you guys would like to see the > numbers of the current top of the line intel xeon > well, but i also guess that this machine has cost ALOT more than what you > spent on yours. Intel/HP sure know how to price their current highend stuff > :-) > > - Robert > > > > 2012/12/9 lsslss > > hi Teddy,**** > > ** ** > > yes you are right, it's at 1600MHz with latency 11 CLK at the moment, > while it should be at 9.**** > > I'm going to figure out how to change that, will have set the voltage to > manual probably in the BIOS.**** > > ** ** > > don't know if enabling the IOMMU will do anything for the speeds...**** > > ** ** > > kind regards,**** > > ** ** > > Marcel van Berk**** > > ** ** > > *Hoge Bomen/LSSLSS* > > info@lsslss.nl**** > > ** ** > > www.lsslss.nl**** > > ** ** > > *Van:* After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] *Namens *Teddy > Gage > *Verzonden:* zondag 9 december 2012 21:11 > > *Aan:* After Effects Mail List > *Onderwerp:* Re: [AE] 32core benchmarks**** > > ** ** > > not bad, but I may have spotted one of your bottlenecks: your ram memory > performance and bandwidth are less than a third of the scores on my > machine, you may want to check that your ram timings and voltage are > correct in your bios. My RAM is 32 gb 1600 MHZ 7-7-7-20**** > > > intel core i7 3930K hex core @ 4.5 ghz**** > > *Section* > > *Description* > > *Score* > > *Geekbench Score* > > Geekbench 2.4.0 Tryout for Windows x86 (32-bit)**** > > Integer**** > > Processor integer performance**** > > 17354**** > > 16973**** > > Floating Point**** > > Processo > > -- Animator & Editor www.teddygage.com Brooklyn --20cf3074b54c99855404d0c2a006 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Yes over clocking the CPU definitely speeds up the ram bus, on top of which= I have quad channel memory in just the four=A0quad channel slots (4x8gb st= icks=A01600 MHz) on this mobo.=A0If all ram=A0slots are filled, the memory = bandwidth is decreased dramatically, so it's a balance between speed, o= ver clocking, price and capacity.=A0

As you can see by Danny's charts, Cuda performance is de= finitely gimped on the 680 vs the 580. I have a 580 3gb card in my=A0= secondary =A0 render box=A0that blows away the 680. Sadly it has no = 3 monitor support so the 680 is in my main workstation. I'd highly reco= mmend buying up a 580 or 590=A0on eBay as they are currently the best price= / performance cards for Cuda right now. Not to mention easily overclocked = out of the box with the manufacturers software.

On Wednesday, December 12, 2012, Robert Kjettrup wrote:
Hi

Just for fun i tried runnin= g my new 16core (32 threads) Z820 through some of these tests, and comparin= g it there also seems to be some odd numbers for your GPU in cineBench. I h= ave the new Quadro K5000 that as far as i know is a lower clocked version o= f the GTX680 you have in your machine, but my OpenGL fps number are much hi= gher. I only got the K5000 because i have had some bad experience with my f= ormer GTX card that just crashed the OpenGL driver when it was under load f= or longer periods. Would have gone with the GTX680 if i trusted the gamer c= ards more, but "known" stability was prioritised.

CineBench scores:
OpenGL 81.45 fps
CPU 2= 5.07 pts

And running GeekBench (the free 32bit ver= sion) i can see that Teddy has some impressive memory numbers, higher than = i get. Is the memory linked to the CPU clock frequency also? 4.5Ghz is a bi= t higher than my 3.1Ghz :-D

Integer Processor integer performance 32414
Floating Poin= t Processor floating point perf= ormance 42123
Memory Memory performance<= span style=3D"white-space:pre-wrap"> 7071
Stream Memory bandwidth performance 8585
Geekbench score: 28360

not to show off, b= ut i thought some of you guys would like to see the numbers of the current = top of the line intel xeon
well, but i also guess that this m= achine has cost ALOT more than what you spent on yours. Intel/HP sure know = how to price their current highend stuff :-)

=
- Robert



2012/12/9 lsslss = <info@lsslss.nl>

hi Teddy,

=A0<= /u>

yes you are right, it's at 1600MHz with laten= cy 11 CLK at the moment, while it should be at 9.

I'm going to figure out how to change that, w= ill have set the voltage to manual probably in the BIOS.

=A0

don't know if enabling the IOMMU will do anything for the speeds..= .

=A0

kin= d regards,

=A0

Marcel van Berk=

=A0

Hoge Bomen/LSSLSS

info@ls= slss.nl

=A0

www.lsslss.nl

=A0

Van: After = Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] Namens Ted= dy Gage
Verzonden: zondag 9 december 2012 21:11


A= an: After Effects Mail List
Onderwerp: Re: [AE] 32core benchm= arks

=A0

not bad, but I may have spotted one of your bott= lenecks: your ram memory performance and bandwidth are less than a third of= the scores on my machine, you may want to check that your ram timings and = voltage are correct in your bios. My RAM is 32 gb 1600 MHZ 7-7-7-20<= u>


intel core i7 3930K hex core @ 4.5= ghz

Floating Point

Section

Description

Score

Geekbench Score

Geekbench 2.4.0 Tryout for Windows x86 (32-bit)

Integer

Processor integer performance

17354

16973

Processo

=


--
Animator= & Editor
www.teddyga= ge.com
Brooklyn

--20cf3074b54c99855404d0c2a006--