Return-Path: Received: from mail-qa0-f53.google.com ([209.85.216.53] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4938100 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 18:00:50 +0100 Received: by mail-qa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id a19so8023233qad.5 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:05:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=YrGx9F4+X2AFdfCXSn0OFCVBhKzIPmlD5wHG/U1gdR4=; b=pKNflt4n7raAremkDrqF7oJrBk42h0P1ENTKQ9agkXUJTd1FPt4ZmkuwkOdGpY7GEc /Y4rlNlfbCHp/wEeGq6Kz8iUIQURxfTFmySRoRgiAlKckiE2gZkCPaTmug5AIOUZ2/5B Ow0WYiFW71ttGE2QGTbAEU3L5gaL6Y7DDxdt0pWHL7rywRlrrIaM2cguaf/DbamsB8Aw 8jHOdcCGA/OgNAI+EA90V/IfHkZLGLhF4LUOJDqL1/wxJDeC8jC0p0Le1PWCVSgSMUzj hiHUY4ahnl7T1Q8+BusISC+EyLKIDrqGL/wuZVQAqt3D8PSpvDv6cZz6ESeJjMsLW+DM Daow== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.82.75 with SMTP id g11mr22639707qey.12.1356973534383; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:05:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.106.226 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 09:05:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:05:34 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Element 3D performane on Macbook Pro 2011 From: Teddy Gage To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6d8f527c8e1d04d2290515 --047d7b6d8f527c8e1d04d2290515 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You can't really compare them, they are for totally different things. There is theoretically some overlap but it wouldn't really make sense to compare them. Element is more like a particle based 3d engine with no ray tracing features (like glossy reflections, transparency, refraction, and extremely accurate lighting), whereas the AE engine supports all these things but not the import of external 3d files, particle style animations, imported textures or environment maps. So For most things, element is much faster, but not as physically accurate, and can't do ray tracing. Make sense? On Monday, December 31, 2012, Szab=F3 Gergely wrote: > Thanks guys, > > If you have some time, could you make a comprare with the Raytraced > renderer? For example with a simple text movement. What's the difference = in > the render time. > > Thanks > Gary > > 12/31/12 12:25 AM keltez=E9ssel, Jack Tunnicliffe =EDrta: > > Okay, got it installed. Might have been user error on my part with the > serial number but it is working now and is extremely interactive on my > laptop. I"d say it's as fast as it is on my desktop machine at first glan= ce. > > Jack Tunnicliffe > > Java Post Production > > 402, 2206 Dewdney ave. > > Regina, SK > > Canada > > S4R 1H3 > > P. 306-777-0150 > > cell. 306-536-4321 > > www.javapost.ca > > --=20 Animator & Editor www.teddygage.com Brooklyn --047d7b6d8f527c8e1d04d2290515 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You can't really compare them, they are for totally different things. T= here is theoretically some overlap but it wouldn't really make sense to= compare them. Element is more like a particle based 3d engine with no ray = tracing features (like glossy reflections, transparency, refraction, and ex= tremely accurate lighting), whereas the AE engine supports all these things= but not the import of external 3d files, particle style animations, import= ed textures or environment maps. So For=A0most things, element is much fast= er, but not as physically accurate, and can't do ray tracing. Make sens= e?
=A0

On Monday, December 31, 2012, Szab=F3 Gergely wrote:
=20 =20 =20
Thanks guys,

If you have some time, could you make a comprare with the Raytraced renderer? For example with a simple text movement. What's the difference in the render time.

Thanks
Gary

12/31/12 12:25 AM keltez=E9ssel, Jack Tunnicliffe =EDrta:
=20 Okay, got it installed. Might have been user error on my part with the serial number but it is working now and is extremely interactive on my laptop. I"d say it's as fast as it is on m= y desktop machine at first glance.
=
Jack Tunnicliffe

Java Post Prod= uction

402, 2206 Dewdney ave.

Regina, SK

Canada

S4R 1H3

P. 306-777-0150

cell. 306-536-4321

www.javapost.ca

<= /span>
<= /div>


--
Animator= & Editor
www.teddyga= ge.com
Brooklyn

--047d7b6d8f527c8e1d04d2290515--