| Teddy's answer is much the same as the one that I was about to give.
Lutz Albrecht has a good article about some of these differences and limitations, linked to from here: http://blogs.adobe.com/aftereffects/2012/07/element-3d-particle-plug-in-from-video-copilot.html
On Monday, December 31, 2012, Teddy Gage wrote: You can't really compare them, they are for totally different things. There is theoretically some overlap but it wouldn't really make sense to compare them. Element is more like a particle based 3d engine with no ray tracing features (like glossy reflections, transparency, refraction, and extremely accurate lighting), whereas the AE engine supports all these things but not the import of external 3d files, particle style animations, imported textures or environment maps. So For most things, element is much faster, but not as physically accurate, and can't do ray tracing. Make sense?
On Monday, December 31, 2012, Szabó Gergely wrote:
Thanks guys,
If you have some time, could you make a comprare with the
Raytraced renderer? For example with a simple text movement.
What's the difference in the render time.
Thanks
Gary
-- -------------------------------- Todd Kopriva 1510 E Alder St Seattle, WA 98122 (206)437-2296 -------------------------------- "Ultimately, all knowledge is self-knowledge."
- Bruce Lee
|