Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4940734 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:15:55 +0100 Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id xn12so14373327obc.32 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:20:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Rj+xVPk+DcpwoMpOToLk/y3ZF8w+8cLFmHSwfH7bwJg=; b=cTtB3Hc3ZkWFpSVf43Cdac2JRYRM5Y1QmS68AXkGQTKoUYyqwHaLPBf6igbLXrSRaA 1M/8Yrjr8Rm710HNqmOAyR0Gn3gM77gsLNpRx3SVWBXHxohLnTDMR3M8px4AxRsV2FEF wWdkmBCZyhU86gLjTTspGHd1678mpNQA4OagLTqBDzGy3ml6iY+ioiH4zX/xZ5yczbqu s8aiMZJhLxQpeIYMIQWQ3weN1OnFli8XWMets3eSReqYHiGbUohtQ2LMczd9C+FLlur5 MPLi5do6k0lApXugVWrDl55kn2JKuwhQLBnh72YNnis3P+RoV7PxzVoqkQa2Eh1a7E6v 9UFA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.0.199 with SMTP id 7mr29618220oeg.139.1357248045663; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:20:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.94.174 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jan 2013 13:20:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 16:20:45 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] OT [AE] kepler cards & multi-monitor support From: rendernyc To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8fb1f3bea2460b04d268ef55 --e89a8fb1f3bea2460b04d268ef55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This a raytrace test that runs on the CUDA. You can see that faster machines with the same cards will still get better performance but it is heavily CUDA dependent the 6XXs have lower performance per core than the 5XXs or 4XXs as far as CUDA is concerned the upside is that they do run cooler and use less power On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Evan Fotis wrote: > i'm surprized that 480 1.5gb came faster than a 670 4gb & 680 2Gb.. > wasn't this purely a GPU test? > > > On 03-Jan-13 23:00, rendernyc wrote: > > im currently using my GTX card headless and drive the monitor with the AT= I > card it came with. > The 660 is pretty similar to a 670 so it would probably be slightly slowe= r > than a 670 listed here if in a similar machine > > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=3D0AuE_AZZfskx3dHotTzVGamhiUk= IySTUteGlzeG9xMEE#gid=3D2 > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Evan Fotis wrote: > >> has anyone used the GTX 660ti 3GB w AE and has any comments >> recommendations or not? >> Also have used your Kepler cards to drive 3-4 monitors successfully? >> TIA >> >> On 03-Jan-13 16:45, rendernyc wrote: >> >> currently testing out a GTX690 in my macpro >> i had an this extruded shape layer model so i did a quick camera move an= d >> rendered out 3 seconds at 1080 in 10 minutes. >> >> the renderer can make some really nice imagery plus it has the benefit >> of all being animatable right in AE the way you are used to working >> >> https://vimeo.com/56676245 >> >> >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:44 AM, mike cardeiro wrot= e: >> >>> I finally had a chance to play with the new 3d capabilities of CS6.=EF= =BF=BD >>> Heres the link, all the animation was done in after effects, the only t= hing >>> not done in ae was the actual modeling of the snow globe which I did in= 3d >>> max. >>> http://youtu.be/Ha7z18U6MHo >>> >>> I give after effects a big thumbs up, as usual, there were lots of >>> changes and it was so much easier and faster to change and render than = if I >>> did it all in 3d max. >>> >>> Mike Cardeiro >>> Editor/Animator/Compositor=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD= =EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF= =BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD >>> D4 Creative Group - Philadelphia, PA=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD >>> =EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF= =BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD >>> http://www.michaelcardeiro.com/resume/ >>> http://www.youtube.com/user/mcardeiro >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> danny princz >> >> exposedideas.com >> >> >> > > > -- > danny princz > > exposedideas.com > > > --=20 danny princz exposedideas.com --e89a8fb1f3bea2460b04d268ef55 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This a raytrace test that runs on the CUDA. You can see th= at faster machines with the same cards will still get better performance bu= t it is heavily CUDA=C2=A0dependent

the 6XXs have = lower performance per core than the 5XXs or 4XXs as far as CUDA is concerne= d

the upside is that they do run cooler and u= se less power


On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Evan Fotis &l= t;evan.fotis@gmai= l.com> wrote:
=20 =20 =20
i'm surprized that 480 1.5gb came faster than a 670 4gb & 680 2Gb.. wasn't this purely a GPU test?


On 03-Jan-13 23:00, rendernyc wrote:
im currently using my GTX card headless and drive the monitor with the ATI card it came with.
The 660 is pretty similar to a 670 so it would probably be slightly slower than a 670 listed here if in a=C2=A0similar=C2=A0machine



On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Evan Fotis <evan.fotis@gmail.com> wrote:
has anyone used the GTX 660ti 3GB w AE and has any comments recommendations or not?
Also have used your Kepler cards to drive 3-4 monitors successfully?
TIA

On 03-Jan-13 16:45, rendernyc wrote:
currently testing out a GTX690 in my macpro
i had an this extruded shape layer model so i did a quick camera move and rendered out 3 seconds at 1080 in 10 minutes.

the renderer can make some really nice imagery plus it has the benefit of all being animatable right in AE the way you are used to working



On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:44 AM, mike cardeiro <mcardeiro@yahoo.com> wrote:
I finally had a chance to play with the new 3d capabilities of CS6.=EF=BF=BD Heres the = link, all the animation was done in after effects, the only thing not done in ae was the actual modeling of the snow globe which I did in 3d max.
http://youtu.be= /Ha7z18U6MHo
http://www.michaelcardeiro.com/resume/
http://www.youtube.com/user/mcardeiro



--
danny princz

exposedideas.com




--
danny princz

exposedideas.= com




--
danny princz=

exposedideas.com
--e89a8fb1f3bea2460b04d268ef55--