i'm surprized that 480 1.5gb came faster than a 670 4gb & 680 2Gb.. wasn't this purely a GPU test?

On 03-Jan-13 23:00, rendernyc wrote:

im currently using my GTX card headless and drive the monitor with the ATI card it came with.

The 660 is pretty similar to a 670 so it would probably be slightly slower than a 670 listed here if in a similar machine

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AuE_AZZfskx3dHotTzVGamhiUkIySTUteGlzeG9xMEE#gid=2

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Evan Fotis <evan.fotis@gmail.com> wrote:

has anyone used the GTX 660ti 3GB w AE and has any comments recommendations or not?
Also have used your Kepler cards to drive 3-4 monitors successfully?
TIA

On 03-Jan-13 16:45, rendernyc wrote:

currently testing out a GTX690 in my macpro

i had an this extruded shape layer model so i did a quick camera move and rendered out 3 seconds at 1080 in 10 minutes.

the renderer can make some really nice imagery plus it has the benefit of all being animatable right in AE the way you are used to working

https://vimeo.com/56676245

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 10:44 AM, mike cardeiro <mcardeiro@yahoo.com> wrote:

I finally had a chance to play with the new 3d capabilities of CS6.� Heres the link, all the animation was done in after effects, the only thing not done in ae was the actual modeling of the snow globe which I did in 3d max.

http://youtu.be/Ha7z18U6MHo

I give after effects a big thumbs up, as usual, there were lots of changes and it was so much easier and faster to change and render than if I did it all in 3d max.

Mike Cardeiro
Editor/Animator/Compositor����������������
D4 Creative Group - Philadelphia, PA���
�����������
http://www.michaelcardeiro.com/resume/
http://www.youtube.com/user/mcardeiro

--
danny princz

exposedideas.com

--
danny princz

exposedideas.com