Mailing List AE-List@media-motion.tv — Message #47165
From:
rendernyc <rendernyc@gmail.com>
Subject:
Re: [AE] OT [AE] kepler cards & multi-monitor support
Date:
Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:05:36 -0500
To:
After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
The only plugin that i recall using that was CUDA accelerated was NEAT video. and that was blazing fast.
I had a quadro4000 before the 570 and it was appx 3x faster.Â
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Paul Crisanti <paul_eboy@me.com> wrote:
how did the 570 work on your plugins?
Thank you.\
~p
On Jan 3, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Jim Tierney wrote:
A note about the 690…
Â
We ran into a bunch of problems with Premiere and had to disable the multiple GPUs, essentially making it a 680. Judging from what I’ve read online, we’re not the only one, so if you’re using Premiere you might have issues with the 690. (and you might not, seemed to be folks that it worked fine for) We were primarily testing it with Beauty Box, but even with BB uninstalled Premiere still had problems. For Beauty Box itself we’re not supporting multiple GPUs at this time. It’s not that straight forward to support it, so if you buy a 690, just make sure you can return it if your system/apps don’t play nicely with it.
Â
Â
Cheers,
Jim
---------------Â
Jim Tierney
President
Digital Anarchy
Â
Â
Â
From: After Effects Mail List [mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv] On Behalf Of Evan Fotis Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 1:17 PM To: After Effects Mail List Subject: Re: [AE] OT [AE] kepler cards & multi-monitor support
Â
i'm surprized that 480 1.5gb came faster than a 670 4gb & 680 2Gb.. wasn't this purely a GPU test?
On 03-Jan-13 23:00, rendernyc wrote:
im currently using my GTX card headless and drive the monitor with the ATI card it came with.
The 660 is pretty similar to a 670 so it would probably be slightly slower than a 670 listed here if in a similar machine
has anyone used the GTX 660ti 3GB w AE and has any comments recommendations or not? Also have used your Kepler cards to drive 3-4 monitors successfully? TIA
On 03-Jan-13 16:45, rendernyc wrote:
currently testing out a GTX690 in my macpro
i had an this extruded shape layer model so i did a quick camera move and rendered out 3 seconds at 1080 in 10 minutes.
Â
the renderer can make some really nice imagery plus it has the benefit of all being animatable right in AE the way you are used to working
I finally had a chance to play with the new 3d capabilities of CS6.� Heres the link, all the animation was done in after effects, the only thing not done in ae was the actual modeling of the snow globe which I did in 3d max.
I give after effects a big thumbs up, as usual, there were lots of changes and it was so much easier and faster to change and render than if I did it all in 3d max.