Return-Path: <mylenium@mylenium.de>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187] verified)
  by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10)
  with ESMTP-TLS id 4944953 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 06:14:36 +0100
Received: from oxbaltgw54.schlund.de (oxbaltgw54.schlund.de [172.19.246.178])
	by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrbap1) with ESMTP (Nemesis)
	id 0MdXQK-1TcD013bOG-00Q6Y2; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 06:19:37 +0100
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 06:19:37 +0100 (CET)
From: "mylenium@mylenium.de" <mylenium@mylenium.de>
Reply-To: "mylenium@mylenium.de" <mylenium@mylenium.de>
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Message-ID: <97496536.1076047.1357708777928.JavaMail.open-xchange@email.1und1.de>
In-Reply-To: <list-4944943@media-motion.tv>
References: <list-4944943@media-motion.tv>
Subject: Re: [AE] Comparing speeds from CS4 to CS6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_1076046_1168005394.1357708777886"
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Medium
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v6.20.7-Rev4
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:q7fPhYxZ9i5C03hTWdpD4lA6MJMe9Bp9nUB6rXXeSka
 rIvAShlHmH6d8AeXxD1fnC8OYsdux3WfdV4dHdGrjOJUsCnSUc
 LmMKl4Dmf3SNOZGjjzZrK4YiTyVD4Pj/uitFm9FbnNq8Licwy4
 kJXbJtwpD8aMAF6nbXZtWcc1kJuuwvOsLsPOSuxZdXOjfUx8jK
 70QjsE+5a8/ZSlXNyX+x0z7Ip17EtHjbHvufg9XTTH+egJYDf8
 rQKjPcZ76GFkaVxq4JUgTQasN+WGH5hhMlVRxPjSgBxYpjGsbl
 ZIFhTDZ/mr61SI3qAwxtZ7lFTjeLBZWCj+KTwO/yavnc62BpGK
 SIRPB9pg/hIn2rOJ4eM8HYia2KppcGbS2eMJ8M3y9UQRab/xkl
 dF2W3GeczLQltEhpRaYEUFw1w6z1F3inDUZQgc9vbL4OapUpdm
 b/qzO

------=_Part_1076046_1168005394.1357708777886
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

>     Is the new version overall faster?
>=20

Not really. In theory some of that fast previews stuff should accelerate a =
few
things as should the cache, but on a laptop none of that will play out due =
to
limitations in disk I/O and well, in light of problems you will find yourse=
lf
turning off/ not using these features... There's a reason why this post is =
still
popular after 9 months and is one of last year's most popular on my blog:

http://myleniumblog.com/2012/05/15/make-cs6-work-for-you/

Mylenium

[Pour Myl=C3=A8ne, ange sur terre]
-----------------------------------------
www.mylenium.de

Bruce Wainer <brwainer@gmail.com> hat am 9. Januar 2013 um 05:45 geschriebe=
n:

>  Hi all,
>=20
>  I'm currently planning to move from CS4 Master Suite to CS6 Production
> Premium. I've got the cost part settled (Education versions have no upgra=
de
> discount), but I'm wondering about the performance. If I move from CS4 Af=
ter
> Effects and Premiere to CS6, will I see any notable change in performance=
,
> assuming my hardware does not change? My primary machine is a laptop with=
 a
> 512MB ATI card, so I don't expect any acceleration from the Mercury Playb=
ack
> engine nor will I be using raytracing. I'm worried about, will the new
> features slow me down via bloating? Is the new version overall faster?
>  Thanks!
>  Bruce Wainer
>=20

------=_Part_1076046_1168005394.1357708777886
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"/>
 <style type="text/css">.mceResizeHandle {position: absolute;border: 1px solid black;background: #FFF;width: 5px;height: 5px;z-index: 10000}.mceResizeHandle:hover {background: #000}img[data-mce-selected] {outline: 1px solid black}img.mceClonedResizable, table.mceClonedResizable {position: absolute;outline: 1px dashed black;opacity: .5;z-index: 10000}

  </style></head><body style="">
 
  
 
 
  <div> 
   <blockquote type="cite"> 
    <div dir="ltr">
     Is the new version overall faster?
    </div> 
   </blockquote> 
  </div> 
  <p>Not really. In theory some of that fast previews stuff should accelerate a few things as should the cache, but on a laptop none of that will play out due to limitations in disk I/O and well, in light of problems you will find yourself turning off/ not using these features... There&#39;s a reason why this post is still popular after 9 months and is one of last year&#39;s most popular on my blog:</p> 
  <p>http://myleniumblog.com/2012/05/15/make-cs6-work-for-you/</p> 
  <p>Mylenium</p> 
  <div id="ox-signature">
   [Pour Myl&#232;ne, ange sur terre]
   <br/>-----------------------------------------
   <br/>www.mylenium.de
  </div> 
  <div>
   <br/>Bruce Wainer &#60;brwainer@gmail.com&#62; hat am 9. Januar 2013 um 05:45 geschrieben:
  </div> 
  <div style="position: relative;"> 
   <blockquote style="margin-left: 0px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 1px blue;" type="cite"> 
    <div dir="ltr"> 
     <div> 
      <div>
       Hi all,
       <br/>
       <br/>
      </div> I&#39;m currently planning to move from CS4 Master Suite to CS6 Production Premium. I&#39;ve got the cost part settled (Education versions have no upgrade discount), but I&#39;m wondering about the performance. If I move from CS4 After Effects and Premiere to CS6, will I see any notable change in performance, assuming my hardware does not change? My primary machine is a laptop with a 512MB ATI card, so I don&#39;t expect any acceleration from the Mercury Playback engine nor will I be using raytracing. I&#39;m worried about, will the new features slow me down via bloating? Is the new version overall faster?
      <br/> 
     </div> Thanks!
     <br/>Bruce Wainer
    </div> 
   </blockquote> 
   <br/>&#160;
  </div>
 
</body></html>
------=_Part_1076046_1168005394.1357708777886--