Return-Path: Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4956881 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 04:12:50 +0100 Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id mc8so4362967pbc.4 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:18:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:subject:references:from:content-type:x-mailer :in-reply-to:message-id:date:to:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=2cujnX/Shg9FlzcMldikuXq37NRwHzF1trR2ZZ5+ADg=; b=ei4UZzBJGdXJVzOrOTd5LX1jHDyUIqyguHGxcS+86NA6lnVwDglV6BLgdeg/P4M3yp buspluEVqfNC6k/jvKntF+fKd0M9m5mM8XwzWEt+8jwwHWYKfOCnoKJ4DQQVuOs2K5He qQ/3diSgzdreOGwKtrC3/Bgx+UuJCh6vWoheLlWbeVmPmHxJwNOMO+WFJFTODZApo0h0 +c5SZGirSyJxDN+Mawt+B34Fg/7IYfojC+uD/fdqJ5ZD//A1SqpFZOjeKCSTecvSJ4wt 2f/p2hSCdVi76tZL0/8gOyl/8ams4c72mbvDu07SMDkFdPYo4wYu5aMPzvn3ulmi9+ZP iAog== X-Received: by 10.68.253.1 with SMTP id zw1mr44870507pbc.98.1358911095603; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:18:15 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from [10.51.12.57] (125-215-156-122.static.imsbiz.com. [125.215.156.122]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id qr8sm11880615pbc.64.2013.01.22.19.18.12 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:18:13 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [AE] How did they do this? References: From: Christopher Biggs Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-B23AA0FB-4B4D-41FF-A1DD-F2EC5CFE2152 X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10A523) In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <1275DBD7-B262-44DA-93B0-43BDFA4A14B4@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 11:13:09 +0800 To: After Effects Mail List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) --Apple-Mail-B23AA0FB-4B4D-41FF-A1DD-F2EC5CFE2152 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think they may have morphed between the 2 cameras=20 I looked frame to frame no ghosting=20 Some small bits do cross fade, but the main interest doesn't=20 C Sent from Chris's iPhone On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Robert Houghton wrote: > it's reminiscent of Wang Chung. >=20 > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DBoXu6QmxpJE >=20 > -Rob > On 1/22/2013 5:09 PM, Darby Edelen wrote: >> If the goal is inducing nausea, as I can only assume it is, I think there= are technically simpler ways to achieve the end result :) >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rick wrote: >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=3Dplayer_embedded&v=3DHJEahE-4juQ >>>=20 >>> I'm guessing it is done with frame blending and time remapping of still= images. Not great, but at least different. >>> =20 >>> Rick Emery >>> www.rickemery.com >=20 --Apple-Mail-B23AA0FB-4B4D-41FF-A1DD-F2EC5CFE2152 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I think they may have morphed between the 2 cameras 
I looked frame to frame no ghosting 
Some small bits do cross fade, but the main interest doesn't 

C

Sent from Chris's iPhone

On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Robert Houghton <gfxguy74@gmail.com> wrote:

it's reminiscent of Wang Chung.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoXu6QmxpJE

  -Rob
On 1/22/2013 5:09 PM, Darby Edelen wrote:
If the goal is inducing nausea, as I can only assume it is, I think there are technically simpler ways to achieve the end result :)




On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rick <a_pmb_fan@yahoo.com> wrote:

I'm guessing it is done with frame blending  and time remapping of still images.  Not great, but at least different.
 


--Apple-Mail-B23AA0FB-4B4D-41FF-A1DD-F2EC5CFE2152--