Return-Path: Received: from platinum.tritoncore.com ([69.16.213.66] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4956901 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 04:33:54 +0100 Received: from 50-0-136-16.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net ([50.0.136.16]:40365 helo=[10.0.1.33]) by platinum.tritoncore.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TxrBI-0002q9-Bl for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 22:39:20 -0500 From: patrick Siemer Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-500553154 Subject: Re: [AE] How did they do this? Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 19:39:18 -0800 In-Reply-To: To: "After Effects Mail List" References: Message-Id: <2E5FF0A9-005C-4FE6-9586-6D15896E81C7@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - platinum.tritoncore.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - media-motion.tv X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - gmail.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: --Apple-Mail-1-500553154 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I agree. they had two camera angles on each shot. edited the angles = together all Wang Chung style,=20 then ran the whole thing through Twixtor. i would bet on it. patrick siemer tapeandglue.com On Jan 22, 2013, at 7:13 PM, Christopher Biggs wrote: > I think they may have morphed between the 2 cameras=20 > I looked frame to frame no ghosting=20 > Some small bits do cross fade, but the main interest doesn't=20 >=20 > C >=20 > Sent from Chris's iPhone >=20 > On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Robert Houghton = wrote: >=20 >> it's reminiscent of Wang Chung. >>=20 >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DBoXu6QmxpJE >>=20 >> -Rob >> On 1/22/2013 5:09 PM, Darby Edelen wrote: >>> If the goal is inducing nausea, as I can only assume it is, I think = there are technically simpler ways to achieve the end result :) >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rick wrote: >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=3Dplayer_embedded&v=3DHJEahE-4ju= Q >>>=20 >>> I'm guessing it is done with frame blending and time remapping of = still images. Not great, but at least different. >>> =20 >>> Rick Emery >>> www.rickemery.com >>>=20 >>=20 --Apple-Mail-1-500553154 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii I = agree. they had two camera angles on each shot. edited the angles = together all Wang Chung style, 
then ran the whole thing = through Twixtor.  i would bet on = it.

patrick siemer


On Jan 22, 2013, at 7:13 PM, Christopher Biggs = wrote:

I think they may have morphed = between the 2 cameras 
I looked frame to frame no = ghosting 
Some small bits do cross fade, but the main = interest doesn't 

C

Sent from = Chris's iPhone

On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Robert = Houghton <gfxguy74@gmail.com> = wrote:

=20 =20 =20 it's reminiscent of Wang Chung.

http://www.youtube.c= om/watch?v=3DBoXu6QmxpJE

  -Rob
On 1/22/2013 5:09 PM, Darby Edelen wrote:
If the goal is inducing nausea, as I can only assume it is, I think there are technically simpler ways to achieve the end result :)




On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rick <a_pmb_fan@yahoo.com> wrote:

I'm guessing it is done with frame blending  and = time remapping of still images.  Not great, but at least different.
 


=20

= --Apple-Mail-1-500553154--