Return-Path: Received: from host23.canaca.com ([66.49.161.151] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 4956909 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 04:36:13 +0100 Received: from static184-169-61-119.r.rev.accesscomm.ca ([184.169.61.119]:38039 helo=[10.0.1.11]) by host23.canaca.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1TxrDX-0000sE-Hy for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 22:41:39 -0500 From: Jack Tunnicliffe Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2B869BCF-C422-490B-AEAB-6E4F7B9599A2" Message-Id: <79A51A1A-7A17-44D7-9A82-CC385B9CAEBD@javapost.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\)) Subject: Re: [AE] How did they do this? Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 21:41:39 -0600 References: To: "After Effects Mail List" In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host23.canaca.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - media-motion.tv X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - javapost.ca X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: host23.canaca.com: authenticated_id: jack+javapost.ca/only user confirmed/virtual account not confirmed X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: --Apple-Mail=_2B869BCF-C422-490B-AEAB-6E4F7B9599A2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii How do they do it on live sports where they have only two angles and do = this perfect dolly from one angle to the other. It's impressive. Jack Tunnicliffe Java Post Production On Jan 22, 2013, at 9:39 PM, patrick Siemer wrote: > I agree. they had two camera angles on each shot. edited the angles = together all Wang Chung style,=20 > then ran the whole thing through Twixtor. i would bet on it. >=20 > patrick siemer > tapeandglue.com >=20 >=20 > On Jan 22, 2013, at 7:13 PM, Christopher Biggs wrote: >=20 >> I think they may have morphed between the 2 cameras=20 >> I looked frame to frame no ghosting=20 >> Some small bits do cross fade, but the main interest doesn't=20 >>=20 >> C >>=20 >> Sent from Chris's iPhone >>=20 >> On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Robert Houghton = wrote: >>=20 >>> it's reminiscent of Wang Chung. >>>=20 >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DBoXu6QmxpJE >>>=20 >>> -Rob >>> On 1/22/2013 5:09 PM, Darby Edelen wrote: >>>> If the goal is inducing nausea, as I can only assume it is, I think = there are technically simpler ways to achieve the end result :) >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rick wrote: >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=3Dplayer_embedded&v=3DHJEahE-4j= uQ >>>>=20 >>>> I'm guessing it is done with frame blending and time remapping of = still images. Not great, but at least different. >>>> =20 >>>> Rick Emery >>>> www.rickemery.com >>>>=20 >>>=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail=_2B869BCF-C422-490B-AEAB-6E4F7B9599A2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii How = do they do it on live sports where they have only two angles and do this = perfect dolly from one angle to the other. It's impressive.

Jack = Tunnicliffe


On Jan 22, 2013, at 9:39 PM, patrick Siemer <siemer@gmail.com> = wrote:

I agree. they had two = camera angles on each shot. edited the angles together all Wang Chung = style, 
then ran the whole thing through Twixtor.  i would = bet on it.

patrick siemer

<= div>
On Jan 22, 2013, at 7:13 PM, Christopher Biggs = wrote:

I think they may have morphed = between the 2 cameras 
I looked frame to frame no = ghosting 
Some small bits do cross fade, but the main = interest doesn't 

C

Sent from = Chris's iPhone

On Jan 23, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Robert = Houghton <gfxguy74@gmail.com> = wrote:

=20 =20 =20 it's reminiscent of Wang Chung.

http://www.youtube.c= om/watch?v=3DBoXu6QmxpJE

  -Rob
On 1/22/2013 5:09 PM, Darby Edelen wrote:
If the goal is inducing nausea, as I can only assume it is, I think there are technically simpler ways to achieve the end result :)




On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Rick <a_pmb_fan@yahoo.com> wrote:

I'm guessing it is done with frame blending  and = time remapping of still images.  Not great, but at least different.
 


=20 =

<= br>= --Apple-Mail=_2B869BCF-C422-490B-AEAB-6E4F7B9599A2--